Impact of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation on Disease Progression

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Karim Benali MD , Laurent Macle MD , Michel Haïssaguerre MD , Stanley Nattel MD, PhD , Marc Deyell MD , Antoine Da Costa MD , Jason G. Andrade MD
{"title":"Impact of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation on Disease Progression","authors":"Karim Benali MD ,&nbsp;Laurent Macle MD ,&nbsp;Michel Haïssaguerre MD ,&nbsp;Stanley Nattel MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marc Deyell MD ,&nbsp;Antoine Da Costa MD ,&nbsp;Jason G. Andrade MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a major public health challenge worldwide with a globally increasing prevalence and exponential increase in health care costs. The progression from paroxysmal (defined as self-terminating episodes of AF lasting &lt;7 days) to persistent AF (eg, AF episodes lasting longer than 7 days) is associated with premature mortality, increasing incidence of thromboembolism and heart failure, as well as increased rates of hospitalization and health care use. Given recognition that complications of AF increase as the disease advances, there is an urgent need to ensure therapeutic interventions are capable of delaying or halting disease progression. Whereas pharmacotherapy can be relatively effective at managing the symptoms associated with AF, antiarrhythmic drugs are less effective than catheter ablation in reducing arrhythmia burden, improving quality of life, and reducing health care use. Moreover, pharmacologic therapy does not modify the pathophysiological processes responsible for disease progression. Catheter ablation confers a more comprehensive disease-modifying intervention, targeting multiple mechanisms underlying AF progression through a combination of trigger elimination, electroanatomical substrate modification, and autonomic nervous system modulation. Until recently, the belief that catheter ablation was an effective method to prevent disease progression was mostly speculative. However, recent randomized controlled trials have established catheter ablation as disease-modifying intervention. Given this knowledge, it appears that early intervention is critical to optimally affect the disease progression. The purpose of this paper is to review the rationale and evidence supporting disease modification using catheter ablation as a key part of the AF treatment paradigm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 421-435"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24008855","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a major public health challenge worldwide with a globally increasing prevalence and exponential increase in health care costs. The progression from paroxysmal (defined as self-terminating episodes of AF lasting <7 days) to persistent AF (eg, AF episodes lasting longer than 7 days) is associated with premature mortality, increasing incidence of thromboembolism and heart failure, as well as increased rates of hospitalization and health care use. Given recognition that complications of AF increase as the disease advances, there is an urgent need to ensure therapeutic interventions are capable of delaying or halting disease progression. Whereas pharmacotherapy can be relatively effective at managing the symptoms associated with AF, antiarrhythmic drugs are less effective than catheter ablation in reducing arrhythmia burden, improving quality of life, and reducing health care use. Moreover, pharmacologic therapy does not modify the pathophysiological processes responsible for disease progression. Catheter ablation confers a more comprehensive disease-modifying intervention, targeting multiple mechanisms underlying AF progression through a combination of trigger elimination, electroanatomical substrate modification, and autonomic nervous system modulation. Until recently, the belief that catheter ablation was an effective method to prevent disease progression was mostly speculative. However, recent randomized controlled trials have established catheter ablation as disease-modifying intervention. Given this knowledge, it appears that early intervention is critical to optimally affect the disease progression. The purpose of this paper is to review the rationale and evidence supporting disease modification using catheter ablation as a key part of the AF treatment paradigm.
房颤导管消融对疾病进展的影响
房颤(AF)仍然是世界范围内的一个主要公共卫生挑战,全球患病率不断上升,卫生保健费用呈指数级增长。从阵发性(定义为持续7天的房颤自我终止发作)到持续性房颤(如房颤持续7天以上)的进展与过早死亡、血栓栓塞和心力衰竭发生率增加以及住院率和医疗保健使用率增加有关。鉴于认识到房颤并发症随着疾病进展而增加,迫切需要确保治疗干预能够延缓或阻止疾病进展。虽然药物治疗在控制房颤相关症状方面相对有效,但抗心律失常药物在减轻心律失常负担、改善生活质量和减少医疗保健使用方面不如导管消融有效。此外,药物治疗不会改变导致疾病进展的病理生理过程。导管消融提供了更全面的疾病改善干预,通过结合触发消除、电解剖底物修饰和自主神经系统调节,针对房颤进展的多种机制。直到最近,认为导管消融是预防疾病进展的有效方法主要是推测性的。然而,最近的随机对照试验已经证实导管消融是一种改善疾病的干预措施。鉴于这些知识,早期干预似乎对最佳影响疾病进展至关重要。本文的目的是回顾支持使用导管消融作为房颤治疗范例的关键部分的疾病改良的基本原理和证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信