Can China's renewable energy policy synergies help clean energy transition?

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bo Wang , Guangchuan Liu , Silin Zhou , Zishan Tang , Zuyao Liu , Nana Deng , Zhaohua Wang
{"title":"Can China's renewable energy policy synergies help clean energy transition?","authors":"Bo Wang ,&nbsp;Guangchuan Liu ,&nbsp;Silin Zhou ,&nbsp;Zishan Tang ,&nbsp;Zuyao Liu ,&nbsp;Nana Deng ,&nbsp;Zhaohua Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy transition as a key strategy for achieving climate goals is garnering global attention, with nations actively employing renewable energy (RE) policy instruments to facilitate this shift. Despite extensive research on individual policy impacts, the synergistic or trade-off effects of multiple policies on energy transition require further exploration, especially in countries with market conditions similar to China. This study introduces a provincial energy transition index (ETI) and employs text and association rule mining to discern the policy intensity and key synergies of China's typical RE policies (including feed-in tariff (FIT), carbon emission trading (CET), tradable green certificates (TGC), electricity market (EM) reform, and renewable portfolio standard (RPS)). Based on provincial panel data from 2006 to 2022 in China, their effectiveness is evaluated using a difference-in-differences (DID) estimation. Empirical results indicate that: (1) the national ETI increased by 10.3 % during the study period, with significant regional disparities. (2) three key policy synergies—EM-TGC, FIT-EM-TGC, and RPS-EM-TGC—were identified, with their temporal evolution reflecting a shift in China's energy transition policies from administrative to market-oriented mechanisms. (3) synergy analysis reveals that the EM-TGC synergy is more effective than the standalone TGC policy, and the coordination of FIT further enhances the EM-TGC synergy in current stage of energy transition. Compared to other policy combinations, the RPS-EM-TGC combination is more effective, promoting synergistic development in new energy generation, grid integration, and market absorption. Beyond the China context, this analysis contributes to policy discourse on advancing energy transition in regulated markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 107878"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525000757","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy transition as a key strategy for achieving climate goals is garnering global attention, with nations actively employing renewable energy (RE) policy instruments to facilitate this shift. Despite extensive research on individual policy impacts, the synergistic or trade-off effects of multiple policies on energy transition require further exploration, especially in countries with market conditions similar to China. This study introduces a provincial energy transition index (ETI) and employs text and association rule mining to discern the policy intensity and key synergies of China's typical RE policies (including feed-in tariff (FIT), carbon emission trading (CET), tradable green certificates (TGC), electricity market (EM) reform, and renewable portfolio standard (RPS)). Based on provincial panel data from 2006 to 2022 in China, their effectiveness is evaluated using a difference-in-differences (DID) estimation. Empirical results indicate that: (1) the national ETI increased by 10.3 % during the study period, with significant regional disparities. (2) three key policy synergies—EM-TGC, FIT-EM-TGC, and RPS-EM-TGC—were identified, with their temporal evolution reflecting a shift in China's energy transition policies from administrative to market-oriented mechanisms. (3) synergy analysis reveals that the EM-TGC synergy is more effective than the standalone TGC policy, and the coordination of FIT further enhances the EM-TGC synergy in current stage of energy transition. Compared to other policy combinations, the RPS-EM-TGC combination is more effective, promoting synergistic development in new energy generation, grid integration, and market absorption. Beyond the China context, this analysis contributes to policy discourse on advancing energy transition in regulated markets.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信