Prognostic impact of preoperative cachexia in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery for malignancy

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Yuki Fugane , Shinya Tanaka , Yota Mizuno , Hiroki Nakajima , Hiromasa Yamamoto , Takayuki Inoue , Motoki Nagaya , Yoshihiro Nishida , Shunsuke Onoe , Junpei Yamaguchi , Takashi Mizuno , Yukihiro Yokoyama , Tomoki Ebata
{"title":"Prognostic impact of preoperative cachexia in patients undergoing major hepatopancreatobiliary surgery for malignancy","authors":"Yuki Fugane ,&nbsp;Shinya Tanaka ,&nbsp;Yota Mizuno ,&nbsp;Hiroki Nakajima ,&nbsp;Hiromasa Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Takayuki Inoue ,&nbsp;Motoki Nagaya ,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Nishida ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Onoe ,&nbsp;Junpei Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Takashi Mizuno ,&nbsp;Yukihiro Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Tomoki Ebata","doi":"10.1016/j.clnu.2025.02.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; aims</h3><div>Data regarding the association between cachexia and clinical outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) malignancies are limited. This retrospective study sought to investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative cachexia in patients undergoing major HPB surgery for malignancies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from patients, who underwent major open surgery for HPB malignancies between March 2014 and December 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Cachexia was evaluated a few days before surgery, and defined according to modified Asian Working Group for Cachexia criteria: low body mass index (&lt;21 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and decreased handgrip strength (&lt;28 kg [males] and &lt;18 kg [females]) or elevated C-reactive protein level (&gt;0.5 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was postoperative overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS) and postoperative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 332 patients (228 male; mean age, 68.8 ± 10.3 years), 93 (28 %) had preoperative cachexia. There were 154 (46 %) deaths and 181 (55 %) combined events (death or recurrence) during a five-year follow-up (mean, 3.3 ± 1.7 years), with no significant differences in major postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.329). After adjusting for covariates, cachexia (n = 93) exhibited significant associations with shorter OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.65 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.18–2.30]; P = 0.004) and DFS (adjusted HR 1.39 [95 % CI 1.01–1.91; P = 0.043) compared with non-cachexia (n = 239). Cachexia significantly shortened OS only in a subset with pathological stage ≤ II disease (adjusted HR 2.45 [95 % CI 1.27–4.74]; P = 0.008) but not otherwise (P for interaction, 0.040).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Preoperative cachexia did not affect short-term surgical complications but significantly deteriorated postoperative prognosis in patients who underwent surgery for HPB malignancies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10517,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition","volume":"47 ","pages":"Pages 112-118"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261561425000494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims

Data regarding the association between cachexia and clinical outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) malignancies are limited. This retrospective study sought to investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative cachexia in patients undergoing major HPB surgery for malignancies.

Methods

Data from patients, who underwent major open surgery for HPB malignancies between March 2014 and December 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Cachexia was evaluated a few days before surgery, and defined according to modified Asian Working Group for Cachexia criteria: low body mass index (<21 kg/m2) and decreased handgrip strength (<28 kg [males] and <18 kg [females]) or elevated C-reactive protein level (>0.5 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was postoperative overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS) and postoperative complications.

Results

Of 332 patients (228 male; mean age, 68.8 ± 10.3 years), 93 (28 %) had preoperative cachexia. There were 154 (46 %) deaths and 181 (55 %) combined events (death or recurrence) during a five-year follow-up (mean, 3.3 ± 1.7 years), with no significant differences in major postoperative complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.329). After adjusting for covariates, cachexia (n = 93) exhibited significant associations with shorter OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.65 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.18–2.30]; P = 0.004) and DFS (adjusted HR 1.39 [95 % CI 1.01–1.91; P = 0.043) compared with non-cachexia (n = 239). Cachexia significantly shortened OS only in a subset with pathological stage ≤ II disease (adjusted HR 2.45 [95 % CI 1.27–4.74]; P = 0.008) but not otherwise (P for interaction, 0.040).

Conclusions

Preoperative cachexia did not affect short-term surgical complications but significantly deteriorated postoperative prognosis in patients who underwent surgery for HPB malignancies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition
Clinical nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.30%
发文量
356
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition, the official journal of ESPEN, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, is an international journal providing essential scientific information on nutritional and metabolic care and the relationship between nutrition and disease both in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Published bi-monthly, each issue combines original articles and reviews providing an invaluable reference for any specialist concerned with these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信