Improving dynamic endurance time predictions for shoulder fatigue: A comparative evaluation

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Patricia O'Sullivan , Matteo Menolotto , Brendan O'Flynn , Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris
{"title":"Improving dynamic endurance time predictions for shoulder fatigue: A comparative evaluation","authors":"Patricia O'Sullivan ,&nbsp;Matteo Menolotto ,&nbsp;Brendan O'Flynn ,&nbsp;Dimitrios-Sokratis Komaris","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are commonplace in industry and a host of qualitative and quantitative approaches have been used to assuage the problem, including wearable sensors and biomechanical endurance models, both of which were used in the present study. Six endurance models (consumed endurance, new improved consumed endurance and the exponential and power Frey Law and Avin general and shoulder models) with four alternative maximum torque (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) quantification methods, including a novel approach to generate <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, were compared. The proposed approach to quantify <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>r</mi><mi>q</mi><mi>u</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow><mi>max</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>, in combination with the new improved consumed endurance model produced the lowest root mean square errors (RMSE), and indicated improved performance compared to the literature. The mean RMSE was reduced from 41.08s to 19.11s for all subjects, from 26.13s to 12.16s for males, and 51.28s to 24.45s for females using the proposed method. R<sup>2</sup> for 25% and 45% standardised intensity dynamic tasks were .459 and .314 respectively, P &lt; .01. This research provided an optimised and individualised endurance prediction approach for loaded dynamic movements which can be applied to industry tasks and may lead to reduced upper-limb strains, and potentially WMSDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000368702500016X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are commonplace in industry and a host of qualitative and quantitative approaches have been used to assuage the problem, including wearable sensors and biomechanical endurance models, both of which were used in the present study. Six endurance models (consumed endurance, new improved consumed endurance and the exponential and power Frey Law and Avin general and shoulder models) with four alternative maximum torque (Torquemax) quantification methods, including a novel approach to generate Torquemax, were compared. The proposed approach to quantify Torquemax, in combination with the new improved consumed endurance model produced the lowest root mean square errors (RMSE), and indicated improved performance compared to the literature. The mean RMSE was reduced from 41.08s to 19.11s for all subjects, from 26.13s to 12.16s for males, and 51.28s to 24.45s for females using the proposed method. R2 for 25% and 45% standardised intensity dynamic tasks were .459 and .314 respectively, P < .01. This research provided an optimised and individualised endurance prediction approach for loaded dynamic movements which can be applied to industry tasks and may lead to reduced upper-limb strains, and potentially WMSDs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信