Estimation of carbon sink potential of restored quarries: A machine learning approach based on reference ecosystem

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Qinyu Wu , Shaoliang Zhang , Yongjun Yang , Huping Hou , Chuangsheng Xu
{"title":"Estimation of carbon sink potential of restored quarries: A machine learning approach based on reference ecosystem","authors":"Qinyu Wu ,&nbsp;Shaoliang Zhang ,&nbsp;Yongjun Yang ,&nbsp;Huping Hou ,&nbsp;Chuangsheng Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restoration is an effective natural solution that can help reduce carbon emissions and increase carbon sink. However, there remains a lack of an effective method for assessing the capacity of ecological restoration to augment carbon sequestration. This study developed a machine learning approach that integrated carbon density observations with environmental factors from reference ecosystems to predict the carbon sink potential of restored quarries, as demonstrated in the patent application for a similar method. Additionally, it aimed to assess the impact of ecological restoration on the carbon sink potential of quarries. The results of the study showed that (1) a Random Forest (RF) model was developed to predict the carbon sink potential of restored quarries. The model selected variables such as topography, soil and human activities, and it explained 74 % of the variance of the target variables on the retained data set; (2) The trained RF model was then used to assess 428 quarries, covering a total area of 2279.679 ha, with a carbon sink potential of 136 ± 62.8 (mean ± standard deviation) Mg C/ha. The quarries with highest carbon sink potential reached up to 264.772 Mg C/ha. The total carbon sink potential of all quarries is 307,918.958 Mg C, which is 5.24 times the observed carbon density. (3) The carbon density of restored quarries was influenced by light, moisture, and human activities: it increased with soil moisture and decreased with human activities, and it was highest under moderate light conditions. This study demonstrates the capability and robustness of the developed RF model, which can predict carbon sink potential based on readily available carbon density data and performs well in spatially discrete mining areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 107558"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological restoration is an effective natural solution that can help reduce carbon emissions and increase carbon sink. However, there remains a lack of an effective method for assessing the capacity of ecological restoration to augment carbon sequestration. This study developed a machine learning approach that integrated carbon density observations with environmental factors from reference ecosystems to predict the carbon sink potential of restored quarries, as demonstrated in the patent application for a similar method. Additionally, it aimed to assess the impact of ecological restoration on the carbon sink potential of quarries. The results of the study showed that (1) a Random Forest (RF) model was developed to predict the carbon sink potential of restored quarries. The model selected variables such as topography, soil and human activities, and it explained 74 % of the variance of the target variables on the retained data set; (2) The trained RF model was then used to assess 428 quarries, covering a total area of 2279.679 ha, with a carbon sink potential of 136 ± 62.8 (mean ± standard deviation) Mg C/ha. The quarries with highest carbon sink potential reached up to 264.772 Mg C/ha. The total carbon sink potential of all quarries is 307,918.958 Mg C, which is 5.24 times the observed carbon density. (3) The carbon density of restored quarries was influenced by light, moisture, and human activities: it increased with soil moisture and decreased with human activities, and it was highest under moderate light conditions. This study demonstrates the capability and robustness of the developed RF model, which can predict carbon sink potential based on readily available carbon density data and performs well in spatially discrete mining areas.
恢复采石场碳汇潜力估算:基于参考生态系统的机器学习方法
生态恢复是减少碳排放、增加碳汇的有效自然解决方案。然而,目前还缺乏一种有效的方法来评估生态恢复增强碳固存的能力。该研究开发了一种机器学习方法,将碳密度观测与参考生态系统的环境因素相结合,以预测恢复采石场的碳汇潜力,如类似方法的专利申请所示。此外,旨在评估生态恢复对采石场碳汇潜力的影响。研究结果表明:(1)建立了随机森林(Random Forest, RF)模型来预测采石场恢复后的碳汇潜力。该模型选择了地形、土壤和人类活动等变量,并解释了保留数据集上目标变量方差的74%;(2)利用该模型对428个采石场进行了碳汇潜力评估,采石场总面积为2279.679 ha,碳汇潜力为136±62.8 Mg C/ha(平均±标准差)。碳汇潜力最大的采石场达到264.772 Mg C/ha。所有采石场的总碳汇潜力为307,918.958 Mg C,是观测碳密度的5.24倍。(3)恢复采石场碳密度受光照、湿度和人类活动的影响,随土壤湿度的增加而增加,随人类活动的减少而减少,中等光照条件下碳密度最高。本研究证明了所建立的射频模型的能力和鲁棒性,该模型可以基于现成的碳密度数据预测碳汇潜力,并且在空间离散的矿区表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信