Prescribing pattern and treatment outcomes in upper respiratory tract infection: A comparative study of allopathic and unani medicine

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Faiza Nasir , Malik Itrat , Radhika Kunnavil
{"title":"Prescribing pattern and treatment outcomes in upper respiratory tract infection: A comparative study of allopathic and unani medicine","authors":"Faiza Nasir ,&nbsp;Malik Itrat ,&nbsp;Radhika Kunnavil","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) rank among the top three diagnoses in outpatient settings. URTIs patients currently have access to treatment choices encompassing traditional and allopathic medications. The study aimed to elucidate the prevailing treatment practices in Unani and allopathic systems for URTIs, while concurrently assessing their efficacy in alleviating its symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted at NIUM Hospital and a primary health centre in Bengaluru between June to December 2022. 200 eligible patients (100 per facility) were selected through purposive sampling. Prescriptions were analysed using established WHO and customized Unani indicators. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the WURSS-21 and Jackson scales. Information from the patients was gathered through interviews after obtaining written informed consent.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average number of drugs per prescription was 2.68 in allopathy and 3.87 in Unani medicine. Antihistamines and antibiotics were the most prescribed drugs in allopathy, with cetirizine and amoxicillin dominating the list. In Unani Medicine, <em>Arq Ajeeb</em> and <em>Nuqoo-e-Nazla</em> were commonly prescribed. Only 10.8 % of prescribed drugs in allopathy were from WHO list of essential medicines. Statistically significant improvement (p&lt;0.001) in URTIs symptoms was observed with both Unani and allopathic treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings indicates that average number of drugs per prescription in both facilities were above the recommendations. In allopathy, overprescribing of antibiotics and antihistamines, and deviation from EDL, was observed, while polypharmacy was noted in Unani prescriptions. Findings indicate that both Unani and allopathic treatments are effective in alleviating the URTIs symptoms, as reported by patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958824001265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) rank among the top three diagnoses in outpatient settings. URTIs patients currently have access to treatment choices encompassing traditional and allopathic medications. The study aimed to elucidate the prevailing treatment practices in Unani and allopathic systems for URTIs, while concurrently assessing their efficacy in alleviating its symptoms.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at NIUM Hospital and a primary health centre in Bengaluru between June to December 2022. 200 eligible patients (100 per facility) were selected through purposive sampling. Prescriptions were analysed using established WHO and customized Unani indicators. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the WURSS-21 and Jackson scales. Information from the patients was gathered through interviews after obtaining written informed consent.

Results

The average number of drugs per prescription was 2.68 in allopathy and 3.87 in Unani medicine. Antihistamines and antibiotics were the most prescribed drugs in allopathy, with cetirizine and amoxicillin dominating the list. In Unani Medicine, Arq Ajeeb and Nuqoo-e-Nazla were commonly prescribed. Only 10.8 % of prescribed drugs in allopathy were from WHO list of essential medicines. Statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) in URTIs symptoms was observed with both Unani and allopathic treatments.

Conclusion

The findings indicates that average number of drugs per prescription in both facilities were above the recommendations. In allopathy, overprescribing of antibiotics and antihistamines, and deviation from EDL, was observed, while polypharmacy was noted in Unani prescriptions. Findings indicate that both Unani and allopathic treatments are effective in alleviating the URTIs symptoms, as reported by patients.
上呼吸道感染的处方模式及治疗效果:对抗疗法与乌纳尼药物的比较研究
背景和目的上呼吸道感染(URTI)是门诊病人的三大诊断之一。目前,上呼吸道感染患者可选择的治疗方法包括传统药物和对抗疗法药物。该研究旨在阐明乌纳尼疗法和对抗疗法治疗 URTIs 的现行治疗方法,同时评估其在缓解症状方面的疗效。材料和方法 2022 年 6 月至 12 月期间,在班加罗尔的 NIUM 医院和一家初级保健中心开展了一项横断面研究。通过有目的的抽样选出了 200 名符合条件的患者(每个医疗机构 100 名)。使用既定的世界卫生组织和定制的尤那尼指标对处方进行分析。使用 WURSS-21 和杰克逊量表评估治疗效果。在获得书面知情同意后,通过访谈收集了患者的信息。在对抗疗法中,抗组胺药和抗生素是处方最多的药物,其中西替利嗪和阿莫西林占主导地位。在尤那尼医学中,Arq Ajeeb 和 Nuqoo-e-Nazla 是常用处方药。只有 10.8%的顺势疗法处方药来自世界卫生组织的基本药物清单。乌纳尼疗法和对抗疗法都能明显改善尿路感染症状(p<0.001)。在对抗疗法中,发现抗生素和抗组胺药的处方过多,偏离了 EDL,而在尤那尼疗法的处方中则发现了多药现象。研究结果表明,根据患者的报告,尤那尼疗法和对抗疗法都能有效缓解尿路感染的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信