Igor F. Mendonça , Gabriel S. do Vale , Rafael B.W. Evaristo , Rômulo C. Dutra , Pedro Paulo de Oliveira Rodrigues , Edgar A. Silveira , Grace Ghesti
{"title":"Optimizing torrefaction of banana waste (peels and rachis) for sustainable biocoal production in rural communities","authors":"Igor F. Mendonça , Gabriel S. do Vale , Rafael B.W. Evaristo , Rômulo C. Dutra , Pedro Paulo de Oliveira Rodrigues , Edgar A. Silveira , Grace Ghesti","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the optimization of banana residue's torrefaction, specifically rachis and peel, by evaluating their potential as biocoal. This research aligns with circular economy principles, aiming to reduce waste and enhance the agro-industrial production chain. It also seeks to benefit small-scale farmers, particularly in remote areas without access to advanced technologies or biorefinery systems. Torrefaction conditions were optimized for biocoal quality and combustion emissions reduction using Response Surface Methodology, evaluating temperature (155–325 °C), time (12–68 min), and a 10 °C min<sup>−1</sup> heating rate under an inert atmosphere. Analytical assessments included yields, proximate, ultimate and calorific (Higher Heating Value, HHV) analyses, and combustion emissions estimations (CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, and NOx). Results demonstrated solid yields ranging from 92.02 to 52.62 % for rachis and 91.92–56.46 % for peel, while HHVs ranged from 15.61 to 17.26 MJ kg<sup>−1</sup> and 17.11–20.16 MJ kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The optimized torrefaction conditions were 255 °C for 60 min for rachis and 249 °C for 20 min for peel. These conditions resulted in an SY of 63.21 % for rachis and 72.15 % for peel, with HHVs of 17.01 MJ kg<sup>−1</sup> and 19.87 MJ kg<sup>−1</sup> and ash content of 15.78 % and 14.92 %, respectively, suggesting greater energy yield for biofuel application. High ash content suggests the need for pre-treatment techniques or material blending to enhance the usability of biocoal as biofuel. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for the combustion of optimized biocoal were 1310.75 for peel and 1142.78 kg ton<sup>−1</sup> for rachis, with the potential for reduced carbon intensity compared to conventional fuels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 107726"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425001370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the optimization of banana residue's torrefaction, specifically rachis and peel, by evaluating their potential as biocoal. This research aligns with circular economy principles, aiming to reduce waste and enhance the agro-industrial production chain. It also seeks to benefit small-scale farmers, particularly in remote areas without access to advanced technologies or biorefinery systems. Torrefaction conditions were optimized for biocoal quality and combustion emissions reduction using Response Surface Methodology, evaluating temperature (155–325 °C), time (12–68 min), and a 10 °C min−1 heating rate under an inert atmosphere. Analytical assessments included yields, proximate, ultimate and calorific (Higher Heating Value, HHV) analyses, and combustion emissions estimations (CO, CO2, and NOx). Results demonstrated solid yields ranging from 92.02 to 52.62 % for rachis and 91.92–56.46 % for peel, while HHVs ranged from 15.61 to 17.26 MJ kg−1 and 17.11–20.16 MJ kg−1, respectively. The optimized torrefaction conditions were 255 °C for 60 min for rachis and 249 °C for 20 min for peel. These conditions resulted in an SY of 63.21 % for rachis and 72.15 % for peel, with HHVs of 17.01 MJ kg−1 and 19.87 MJ kg−1 and ash content of 15.78 % and 14.92 %, respectively, suggesting greater energy yield for biofuel application. High ash content suggests the need for pre-treatment techniques or material blending to enhance the usability of biocoal as biofuel. CO2 emissions for the combustion of optimized biocoal were 1310.75 for peel and 1142.78 kg ton−1 for rachis, with the potential for reduced carbon intensity compared to conventional fuels.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.