Theory and practice of solution strategies for unsafe acts based on accident causation models: A systematic review

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Chenhui Yuan, Gui Fu, Zhirong Wu, Jinkun Zhao, Meng Han, Shupei Ye
{"title":"Theory and practice of solution strategies for unsafe acts based on accident causation models: A systematic review","authors":"Chenhui Yuan,&nbsp;Gui Fu,&nbsp;Zhirong Wu,&nbsp;Jinkun Zhao,&nbsp;Meng Han,&nbsp;Shupei Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The resolution to unsafe acts, a typical human factor issue, is essential for preventing industrial accidents. Accident causation models can provide an analysis of the concept of unsafe acts, establishing a theoretical framework for identifying and intervening in unsafe acts. This systematic review focuses on analyzing their defining characteristic attributes and intervention strategies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was adopted in this study, 62 relevant papers from Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest were analyzed. Research trends in the topic were summarized, including annual publication volume, literature sources, the application of accident causation models and analytical techniques. 4 defining attributes of unsafe acts were extracted, including violations, errors, accident-causing, and risk. 2 categories of act performers were identified: front-line workers or personnel at all levels. Furthermore, 14 types of solution strategies for unsafe acts, which also function as accident prevention strategies, were specified. Key strategies include safety supervision, safety education and training, safety culture, etc. Finally, this study proposes a 4-level application stage for identifying unsafe acts and integrates 14 strategies to construct a systematic solution framework, forming a comprehensive safety management system that provides theoretical support and practical guidance for future safety practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 105605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025000634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The resolution to unsafe acts, a typical human factor issue, is essential for preventing industrial accidents. Accident causation models can provide an analysis of the concept of unsafe acts, establishing a theoretical framework for identifying and intervening in unsafe acts. This systematic review focuses on analyzing their defining characteristic attributes and intervention strategies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was adopted in this study, 62 relevant papers from Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest were analyzed. Research trends in the topic were summarized, including annual publication volume, literature sources, the application of accident causation models and analytical techniques. 4 defining attributes of unsafe acts were extracted, including violations, errors, accident-causing, and risk. 2 categories of act performers were identified: front-line workers or personnel at all levels. Furthermore, 14 types of solution strategies for unsafe acts, which also function as accident prevention strategies, were specified. Key strategies include safety supervision, safety education and training, safety culture, etc. Finally, this study proposes a 4-level application stage for identifying unsafe acts and integrates 14 strategies to construct a systematic solution framework, forming a comprehensive safety management system that provides theoretical support and practical guidance for future safety practices.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信