Nonwovens used for the production of respiratory protective equipment and its ecotoxicological impact on specific soil samples

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Petra Roupcová , Jan Slaný , Jana Suchánková , Melánie Barabášová , Kateřina Smutná , Michaela Skřížovská , Karel Klouda
{"title":"Nonwovens used for the production of respiratory protective equipment and its ecotoxicological impact on specific soil samples","authors":"Petra Roupcová ,&nbsp;Jan Slaný ,&nbsp;Jana Suchánková ,&nbsp;Melánie Barabášová ,&nbsp;Kateřina Smutná ,&nbsp;Michaela Skřížovská ,&nbsp;Karel Klouda","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>At the time of COVID-19, the production and consumption of respiratory protection products, as well as the amount of waste generated from these products, was huge. A part of this amount got into the free landscape. This study addresses the toxicity of two materials that have been used to manufacture respiratory protection products, these are mainly laminated and non-laminated nonwovens. Three bearing experiments were carried out. (1) Ecotoxicity testing the inhibition test on <em>Lactuca sativa</em> seeds, (2) Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests, and (3) Avoidance test with earthworms <em>Eisenia andrei</em>. All experiments are a part of a broader framework of environmental toxicity assessments, particularly focused on soil health. These tests, though different in their specific procedures, share common goals of evaluating the effects of chemicals or contaminated environments on organisms and ecosystem functioning. Although acute toxicity has not been confirmed, avoidance behaviour of the earthworms was evident and nonwoven material mechanically adhered to their tissue. Moreover, the lack of demonstration of acute toxicity does not mean that nonwoven micro(nano)plastics cannot accumulate in the organisms and cause negative long-term effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 105603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025000610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the time of COVID-19, the production and consumption of respiratory protection products, as well as the amount of waste generated from these products, was huge. A part of this amount got into the free landscape. This study addresses the toxicity of two materials that have been used to manufacture respiratory protection products, these are mainly laminated and non-laminated nonwovens. Three bearing experiments were carried out. (1) Ecotoxicity testing the inhibition test on Lactuca sativa seeds, (2) Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests, and (3) Avoidance test with earthworms Eisenia andrei. All experiments are a part of a broader framework of environmental toxicity assessments, particularly focused on soil health. These tests, though different in their specific procedures, share common goals of evaluating the effects of chemicals or contaminated environments on organisms and ecosystem functioning. Although acute toxicity has not been confirmed, avoidance behaviour of the earthworms was evident and nonwoven material mechanically adhered to their tissue. Moreover, the lack of demonstration of acute toxicity does not mean that nonwoven micro(nano)plastics cannot accumulate in the organisms and cause negative long-term effects.

Abstract Image

用于生产呼吸防护设备的非织造布及其对特定土壤样品的生态毒理学影响
在新冠肺炎疫情期间,呼吸防护产品的生产和消费以及这些产品产生的废物数量巨大。其中一部分进入了自由景观。本研究探讨了用于制造呼吸防护产品的两种材料的毒性,主要是层压和非层压非织造布。进行了三次轴承试验。(1)生态毒性试验:对蚕豆种子的抑制试验;(2)对蚯蚓的急性毒性试验;(3)对蚯蚓的避害试验。所有实验都是一个更广泛的环境毒性评估框架的一部分,特别侧重于土壤健康。这些测试虽然在具体程序上有所不同,但在评估化学品或受污染的环境对生物体和生态系统功能的影响方面有着共同的目标。虽然急性毒性尚未得到证实,但蚯蚓的回避行为是明显的,非织造材料机械地粘附在它们的组织上。此外,缺乏急性毒性的证据并不意味着非织造微(纳米)塑料不会在生物体中积累并造成负面的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信