Effects of alcohol content information on sensory perception and satisfaction of full portions of regular beers and beer alternatives consumed at home

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Takahiro Wakihira , Michel Visalli , Pascal Schlich
{"title":"Effects of alcohol content information on sensory perception and satisfaction of full portions of regular beers and beer alternatives consumed at home","authors":"Takahiro Wakihira ,&nbsp;Michel Visalli ,&nbsp;Pascal Schlich","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reduced/non-alcohol beers are often less liked than regular beers. However, it is not clear whether this is only due to poor sensory characteristics of beer alternatives or to negative expectations regarding them as well. The objective of this study was to test the effect of alcohol content information on sensory perception and satisfaction of full portions of regular beers and beer alternatives. Japanese beer consumers tasted six beers with alcohol by volume levels of 5 %, 0.5 %, or 0 % (two different products for each alcohol level). Of the participants (<em>N</em> = 271), 137 were users of beer alternatives with less than 1 % alcohol content, and 134 were non-users. First, the consumers tasted the beers without information about their alcohol content. Then, they tasted the same beers with information about the corresponding alcohol content (“5 %” or “less than 1%”). The consumers evaluated full portions of the beers at home based on sensory perception and satisfaction. Results showed that the beer alternatives were significantly less appreciated than the regular beers for both users and non-users of beer alternatives, with this effect being stronger in non-users. The satisfaction scores for beer alternatives among non-users decreased significantly when the “less than 1 %” information was displayed, but this was not the case for users. Only among non-users, the perception of the intensity of <em>aftertaste, body,</em> and <em>malty</em> attributes decreased significantly when the information was displayed. These results suggest that a cognitive bias due to non-users' negative expectations regarding beer alternatives may affect sensory perception and decrease satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105478"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000539","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reduced/non-alcohol beers are often less liked than regular beers. However, it is not clear whether this is only due to poor sensory characteristics of beer alternatives or to negative expectations regarding them as well. The objective of this study was to test the effect of alcohol content information on sensory perception and satisfaction of full portions of regular beers and beer alternatives. Japanese beer consumers tasted six beers with alcohol by volume levels of 5 %, 0.5 %, or 0 % (two different products for each alcohol level). Of the participants (N = 271), 137 were users of beer alternatives with less than 1 % alcohol content, and 134 were non-users. First, the consumers tasted the beers without information about their alcohol content. Then, they tasted the same beers with information about the corresponding alcohol content (“5 %” or “less than 1%”). The consumers evaluated full portions of the beers at home based on sensory perception and satisfaction. Results showed that the beer alternatives were significantly less appreciated than the regular beers for both users and non-users of beer alternatives, with this effect being stronger in non-users. The satisfaction scores for beer alternatives among non-users decreased significantly when the “less than 1 %” information was displayed, but this was not the case for users. Only among non-users, the perception of the intensity of aftertaste, body, and malty attributes decreased significantly when the information was displayed. These results suggest that a cognitive bias due to non-users' negative expectations regarding beer alternatives may affect sensory perception and decrease satisfaction.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信