Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’

Christopher S. Chapman, Di Wang
{"title":"Writing method sections in qualitative accounting research: Engaging with landmark citations through ‘instructively selective elaboration’","authors":"Christopher S. Chapman, Di Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing method sections for qualitative studies in accounting is challenging, partly due to the diverse methodological bases upon which different researchers can draw, partly because of the nature of collecting and analysing qualitative data which is semi-structured at best. Given the space constraints increasingly facing journal articles, this requires a delicate balance between succinct mobilisation of general principles, discussion of how these relate to the situational specifics of field setting, research question and the many skilful practices that make up individual field studies. This is particularly challenging for emerging qualitative scholars who have little direct experience to draw on in striking such a balance. To support them in this challenge we propose the benefits of “instructively selective elaboration” as an approach to writing method sections. We argue that such an approach has the potential to earn a sense of trustworthiness of individual studies, but further to also contribute to field level discussions about situationally and methodologically appropriate choices in qualitative accounting research.
定性会计研究中的写作方法部分:通过“有指导意义的选择性阐述”参与具有里程碑意义的引用
编写会计定性研究的方法部分是具有挑战性的,部分原因是不同的研究人员可以借鉴不同的方法基础,部分原因是收集和分析定性数据的性质,充其量是半结构化的。鉴于期刊文章日益面临的空间限制,这需要在简明扼要地调动一般原则、讨论这些原则如何与实地环境的具体情况、研究问题以及构成个别实地研究的许多熟练实践之间取得微妙的平衡。这对新兴的定性学者来说尤其具有挑战性,因为他们几乎没有直接经验可以借鉴,以达到这种平衡。为了支持他们在这个挑战中,我们提出了“有指导意义的选择性阐述”作为一种写作方法章节的方法的好处。我们认为,这种方法有可能获得个人研究的可信度,但进一步也有助于关于定性会计研究中情境和方法上适当选择的实地讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信