Mixed grass–legume pastures in integrated crop-livestock systems: A strategy to improve soil health and soybean yield in the Brazilian Cerrado

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Luiz Gustavo de O. Denardin, Juliana M. A. S. Moraes, Davi S. Tavares, Gabriela C. Pires, Laércio S. Silva, Leandro P. Pacheco, Flávio J. Wruck, Marco A. C. Carneiro, Edicarlos D. Souza
{"title":"Mixed grass–legume pastures in integrated crop-livestock systems: A strategy to improve soil health and soybean yield in the Brazilian Cerrado","authors":"Luiz Gustavo de O. Denardin, Juliana M. A. S. Moraes, Davi S. Tavares, Gabriela C. Pires, Laércio S. Silva, Leandro P. Pacheco, Flávio J. Wruck, Marco A. C. Carneiro, Edicarlos D. Souza","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07307-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different mixed grass-legume pastures compared to single grass cultivation as the second crop of an integrated crop livestock system (ICLS) in Brazilian Cerrado on (i) soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools, (ii) microbial biomass, enzyme and microbial activity of the soil, (iii) soil health, and (iv) soybean grain yield in succession.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this experiment, the soybean was cultivated in the summer season, with the subsequent treatments with two grasses (<i>Urochloa ruziziensis</i> or <i>Urochloa brizantha</i>), single or intercropped with Cowpea (<i>Vigna unguiculata</i>) or Pigeon pea (<i>Cajanus cajan</i>), and soil collections were carried out 2 years after the implementation of the experiment, which was in 2015.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Regardless of the grass species, Cowpea intercropping yielded 28% more soybeans than single-cropped grasses. The intercropping effects on soybean yield were directly related to improvements in soil biological and biochemical properties since there was a higher microbial biomass and activity, and enzymatic activity in the soil. In addition to the higher basal respiration and metabolic quotient (<i>q</i>CO<sub>2</sub>), the lower microbial quotient (<i>q</i>MIC) indicates a microbial stress condition in grass monoculture compared to mixed grass-legume pastures.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The mixed grass-legume pastures are effective strategies to increase C and N stocks in different soil pools under integrated crop-livestock systems, reflecting increases in soybean grain yield. Grass-legume intercropping in the pasture phase of ICLS is an additional tool to maximize soil health improvements and soybean yields in the short term.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07307-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different mixed grass-legume pastures compared to single grass cultivation as the second crop of an integrated crop livestock system (ICLS) in Brazilian Cerrado on (i) soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools, (ii) microbial biomass, enzyme and microbial activity of the soil, (iii) soil health, and (iv) soybean grain yield in succession.

Methods

In this experiment, the soybean was cultivated in the summer season, with the subsequent treatments with two grasses (Urochloa ruziziensis or Urochloa brizantha), single or intercropped with Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) or Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan), and soil collections were carried out 2 years after the implementation of the experiment, which was in 2015.

Results

Regardless of the grass species, Cowpea intercropping yielded 28% more soybeans than single-cropped grasses. The intercropping effects on soybean yield were directly related to improvements in soil biological and biochemical properties since there was a higher microbial biomass and activity, and enzymatic activity in the soil. In addition to the higher basal respiration and metabolic quotient (qCO2), the lower microbial quotient (qMIC) indicates a microbial stress condition in grass monoculture compared to mixed grass-legume pastures.

Conclusions

The mixed grass-legume pastures are effective strategies to increase C and N stocks in different soil pools under integrated crop-livestock systems, reflecting increases in soybean grain yield. Grass-legume intercropping in the pasture phase of ICLS is an additional tool to maximize soil health improvements and soybean yields in the short term.

Graphical abstract

目的 本研究的目的是评估在巴西塞拉多(Cerrado)的一个综合作物畜牧系统(ICLS)中,不同的草-豆混合牧场作为第二茬作物与单一牧草种植相比,对(i) 土壤有机碳和氮库,(ii) 土壤微生物生物量、酶和微生物活性,(iii) 土壤健康和(iv) 连作大豆谷物产量的影响。方法在该实验中,大豆在夏季种植,随后用两种草(Urochloa ruziziensis 或 Urochloa brizantha)进行处理,单种或与豇豆(Vigna unguiculata)或豌豆(Cajanus cajan)间作,在实验实施两年后,即 2015 年进行土壤采集。结果无论禾本科植物的品种如何,豇豆间作大豆产量比单一禾本科植物间作大豆产量高出 28%。间作对大豆产量的影响与土壤生物和生化特性的改善直接相关,因为土壤中的微生物生物量和活性以及酶活性都有所提高。除了较高的基础呼吸和代谢商数(qCO2)外,较低的微生物商数(qMIC)表明,与草-豆混播相比,单一种植草地的微生物处于应激状态。在综合作物-牲畜系统的牧草阶段进行草-豆类间作是在短期内最大限度地改善土壤健康和提高大豆产量的又一工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信