Supporting older people through Hospital at Home care: a systematic review of patient, carer and healthcare professionals’ perspectives

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Anita Wong, Claudia Cooper, Catherine J Evans, Mark James Rawle, Kate Walters, Simon Paul Conroy, Nathan Davies
{"title":"Supporting older people through Hospital at Home care: a systematic review of patient, carer and healthcare professionals’ perspectives","authors":"Anita Wong, Claudia Cooper, Catherine J Evans, Mark James Rawle, Kate Walters, Simon Paul Conroy, Nathan Davies","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Hospital at Home provides hospital-level type care at home, both remote and face-to-face by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. In practice, various different models are employed, but we do not know what older people, their family carers (carers) and healthcare professionals think of what works best for them. This review aimed to describe the various Hospital at Home models and synthesise literature exploring patient, carer and staff perspectives of Hospital at Home care for older people. Methods and analysis A systematic review of UK studies. Medline, Embase and CINAHL and grey literature were searched from 1991 to 2024, using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria; data were extracted from included papers. Tabulation, thematic grouping and concept mapping of themes were used to narratively synthesise the literature. Results Twenty studies met eligibility. Hospital at Home models included admission avoidance and early discharge. Studies were largely positive regarding Hospital at Home, with benefits including home familiarity, enabling person-centred care and shared decision-making and provision of family carer support. Challenges included staff accessibility, patient and carer anxieties regarding the safety of virtual wards, coordination across sectors and older people using technology. Conclusion Provision of holistic, accessible and continuous care for older people in Hospital at Home services facilitated patient and carer empowerment, dignity and autonomy. There are gaps in our understanding and evidence surrounding paid care workers and informal carers’ perspectives in UK settings, especially within rigorous Hospital at Home literature.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"209 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Hospital at Home provides hospital-level type care at home, both remote and face-to-face by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals. In practice, various different models are employed, but we do not know what older people, their family carers (carers) and healthcare professionals think of what works best for them. This review aimed to describe the various Hospital at Home models and synthesise literature exploring patient, carer and staff perspectives of Hospital at Home care for older people. Methods and analysis A systematic review of UK studies. Medline, Embase and CINAHL and grey literature were searched from 1991 to 2024, using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria; data were extracted from included papers. Tabulation, thematic grouping and concept mapping of themes were used to narratively synthesise the literature. Results Twenty studies met eligibility. Hospital at Home models included admission avoidance and early discharge. Studies were largely positive regarding Hospital at Home, with benefits including home familiarity, enabling person-centred care and shared decision-making and provision of family carer support. Challenges included staff accessibility, patient and carer anxieties regarding the safety of virtual wards, coordination across sectors and older people using technology. Conclusion Provision of holistic, accessible and continuous care for older people in Hospital at Home services facilitated patient and carer empowerment, dignity and autonomy. There are gaps in our understanding and evidence surrounding paid care workers and informal carers’ perspectives in UK settings, especially within rigorous Hospital at Home literature.
通过家庭医院护理支持老年人:对患者、护理人员和卫生保健专业人员观点的系统审查
家庭医院由多学科医疗保健专业人员组成的团队提供远程和面对面的医院级家庭护理。在实践中,采用了各种不同的模式,但我们不知道老年人、他们的家庭照顾者和医疗保健专业人员认为什么对他们最有效。本综述旨在描述各种居家医院模式,并综合文献,探讨患者、护理人员和工作人员对老年人居家医院护理的看法。方法与分析对英国研究的系统回顾。采用预定的纳入和排除标准,检索1991 - 2024年的Medline、Embase和CINAHL文献及灰色文献;数据从纳入的论文中提取。采用制表法、专题分组法和主题概念映射法对文献进行叙事综合。结果20项研究符合条件。居家医院模式包括住院回避和提前出院。关于家庭医院的研究基本上是积极的,其好处包括熟悉家庭,实现以人为本的护理,共同决策和提供家庭护理人员支持。挑战包括工作人员的可及性、患者和护理人员对虚拟病房安全的担忧、跨部门协调以及老年人使用技术。结论:在家庭医院服务中为老年人提供全面、可获得和持续的护理,促进了患者和护理人员的赋权、尊严和自主。在我们的理解和证据方面存在差距,围绕着英国环境中的有偿护理人员和非正式护理人员的观点,特别是在严格的家庭医院文献中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信