A six-year ecotoxicological assessment of the Doce river and coastal marine areas impacted by the Fundão tailings dam failure, Brazil

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Taciana Onesorge Miranda Lopes , Cassia Rodrigues da Silveira , Josiane Araujo da Silva , Thays Guedes , Ronan Adler Tavella , Regina Coimbra Rola , Joseane Aparecida Marques , Carlos Eduardo Delfino Vieira , Adalto Bianchini , Camila de Martinez Gaspar Martins
{"title":"A six-year ecotoxicological assessment of the Doce river and coastal marine areas impacted by the Fundão tailings dam failure, Brazil","authors":"Taciana Onesorge Miranda Lopes ,&nbsp;Cassia Rodrigues da Silveira ,&nbsp;Josiane Araujo da Silva ,&nbsp;Thays Guedes ,&nbsp;Ronan Adler Tavella ,&nbsp;Regina Coimbra Rola ,&nbsp;Joseane Aparecida Marques ,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo Delfino Vieira ,&nbsp;Adalto Bianchini ,&nbsp;Camila de Martinez Gaspar Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.125897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Encompassing six years, 10 sampling campaigns, and more than 800 toxicity tests utilizing a range of organisms from different trophic levels as bioindicators, this study offers a comprehensive ecotoxicological assessment of the environmental impacts resulting from the Fundão dam rupture—one of Brazil's most significant environmental disasters. We employed a novel approach that integrates acute and chronic laboratory toxicity tests to establish a toxicity index classifying samples into five categories: non-toxic, slightly toxic, moderately toxic, toxic, and highly toxic, based on a toxicity value calculated by considering diverse organisms' responses. This evaluation, conducted between 2018 and 2023, spanned both dry and rainy seasons, assessing water and sediment conditions across the Doce River and the adjacent marine region near its mouth. Our findings reveal that, even years after the dam failure, the iron-enriched mine tailings continue to exert a significant impact on the water and sediment of the Doce River and its adjacent marine areas, with the most severe effects observed near the river's mouth and towards the North. Notably, sediment samples consistently exhibited higher toxicity values than water samples across sites and seasons, highlighting the role of sediments as reservoirs for contaminants. The most pronounced toxicological impacts were detected during the initial years following the disaster, with a gradual, though cautious, decrease in toxicity observed in recent campaigns. Emphasis is placed on the sensitivity of microcrustaceans, copepods, and sea urchins, which consistently demonstrated the highest sensitivity to contaminants, making them reliable bioindicators for ongoing monitoring efforts. While recent campaigns identified a gradual decrease in the toxicity index of the environmental samples, especially in the marine environment, this trend must be interpreted with caution. Continuous monitoring is essential to confirm sustained recovery, detect potential recontamination, and identify long-term sub-lethal effects that could impede the full restoration of the affected ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"371 ","pages":"Article 125897"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125002702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Encompassing six years, 10 sampling campaigns, and more than 800 toxicity tests utilizing a range of organisms from different trophic levels as bioindicators, this study offers a comprehensive ecotoxicological assessment of the environmental impacts resulting from the Fundão dam rupture—one of Brazil's most significant environmental disasters. We employed a novel approach that integrates acute and chronic laboratory toxicity tests to establish a toxicity index classifying samples into five categories: non-toxic, slightly toxic, moderately toxic, toxic, and highly toxic, based on a toxicity value calculated by considering diverse organisms' responses. This evaluation, conducted between 2018 and 2023, spanned both dry and rainy seasons, assessing water and sediment conditions across the Doce River and the adjacent marine region near its mouth. Our findings reveal that, even years after the dam failure, the iron-enriched mine tailings continue to exert a significant impact on the water and sediment of the Doce River and its adjacent marine areas, with the most severe effects observed near the river's mouth and towards the North. Notably, sediment samples consistently exhibited higher toxicity values than water samples across sites and seasons, highlighting the role of sediments as reservoirs for contaminants. The most pronounced toxicological impacts were detected during the initial years following the disaster, with a gradual, though cautious, decrease in toxicity observed in recent campaigns. Emphasis is placed on the sensitivity of microcrustaceans, copepods, and sea urchins, which consistently demonstrated the highest sensitivity to contaminants, making them reliable bioindicators for ongoing monitoring efforts. While recent campaigns identified a gradual decrease in the toxicity index of the environmental samples, especially in the marine environment, this trend must be interpreted with caution. Continuous monitoring is essential to confirm sustained recovery, detect potential recontamination, and identify long-term sub-lethal effects that could impede the full restoration of the affected ecosystems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

巴西fund尾矿坝溃坝对多塞河和沿海海域影响的六年生态毒理学评价
这项研究历时6年,开展了10次采样活动,并利用不同营养水平的生物作为生物指标进行了800多次毒性测试,为巴西最严重的环境灾难之一——fund大坝破裂所造成的环境影响提供了全面的生态毒理学评估。我们采用了一种新颖的方法,将急性和慢性实验室毒性测试结合起来,建立了一个毒性指数,将样品分为五类:无毒、轻度毒性、中度毒性、毒性和剧毒,该指数基于考虑不同生物体反应计算的毒性值。这项评估在2018年至2023年期间进行,涵盖了旱季和雨季,评估了多泽河及其河口附近邻近海域的水和沉积物状况。我们的研究结果表明,即使在大坝坍塌数年后,富含铁的尾矿仍在继续对多斯河及其邻近海域的水和沉积物产生重大影响,在河口附近和向北的影响最为严重。值得注意的是,在不同地点和季节,沉积物样品始终表现出比水样更高的毒性值,这突出了沉积物作为污染物储存库的作用。在灾难发生后的最初几年中发现了最明显的毒理学影响,在最近的运动中观察到毒性逐渐下降,尽管很谨慎。重点放在微甲壳类动物、桡足类动物和海胆的敏感性上,这些动物一直表现出对污染物的最高敏感性,使它们成为持续监测工作的可靠生物指标。虽然最近的运动查明环境样本的毒性指数逐渐下降,特别是在海洋环境中,但必须谨慎解释这一趋势。持续监测对于确认持续恢复、发现潜在的再污染和确定可能阻碍受影响生态系统全面恢复的长期亚致死效应至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信