Plate Fixation and Hallux Valgus Deformity Impact on Nonunion Rates in First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Amir R Kachooei, Tara Moncman, Kassem Ghayyad, Steven Raikin, Joseph Daniel
{"title":"Plate Fixation and Hallux Valgus Deformity Impact on Nonunion Rates in First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Amir R Kachooei, Tara Moncman, Kassem Ghayyad, Steven Raikin, Joseph Daniel","doi":"10.1177/19386400251318966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combined effect of fixation type and preoperative deformity together might influence the union rate after the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis. This study aimed to compare the nonunion and failure rate of dorsal locking plate versus cross-screws for the first MTP arthrodesis considering the preoperative deformity, including hallux valgus versus rigidus. We secondarily aimed to compare the observed nonunion rate with the rate in the systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study including 372 patients and 378 feet. The surgical technique was identical except for the use of a dorsal locking plate in 181 (49%) and cross-screws in 191 (51%) MTP joints. The radiographic union was assessed at 3 months postoperative. Those who did not heal by the 3-month follow-up were categorized as a \"symptomatic\" versus \"asymptomatic\" nonunion. Those categorized as nonunion after 3 months were followed until union occurred.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that dorsal locking plate fixation (OR = 10.1, 95% CI: 1.3-80) and hallux valgus deformity (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.2-18) were significantly associated with a higher nonunion rate. At 3-month follow-up, a total of 19 (5%) patients showed nonunion. Of the total nonunions, 15 (79%) were fixed by the locking plate, and 4 (21%) were fixed by cross-screws. Of the 15 nonunions with plate fixation, 6 (40%) underwent a second surgery due to device failure, while none of the cross-screws required a second surgery. Out of the 6 secondary surgeries, 5 (83%) demonstrated a nonunion with valgus deformity and 1 required removal of hardware due to prominent hardware.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support that a dorsal locking plate for the fusion of a hallux valgus deformity is associated with a significantly higher risk of symptomatic nonunion and a secondary surgery compared to cross-screws, possibly due to the failure of the plate in neutralizing the medio-lateral deforming forces.</p><p><strong>Levels of evidence: </strong><i>Level IV, Retrospective Cohort</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400251318966"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251318966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The combined effect of fixation type and preoperative deformity together might influence the union rate after the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis. This study aimed to compare the nonunion and failure rate of dorsal locking plate versus cross-screws for the first MTP arthrodesis considering the preoperative deformity, including hallux valgus versus rigidus. We secondarily aimed to compare the observed nonunion rate with the rate in the systematic reviews.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including 372 patients and 378 feet. The surgical technique was identical except for the use of a dorsal locking plate in 181 (49%) and cross-screws in 191 (51%) MTP joints. The radiographic union was assessed at 3 months postoperative. Those who did not heal by the 3-month follow-up were categorized as a "symptomatic" versus "asymptomatic" nonunion. Those categorized as nonunion after 3 months were followed until union occurred.

Results: The results demonstrated that dorsal locking plate fixation (OR = 10.1, 95% CI: 1.3-80) and hallux valgus deformity (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.2-18) were significantly associated with a higher nonunion rate. At 3-month follow-up, a total of 19 (5%) patients showed nonunion. Of the total nonunions, 15 (79%) were fixed by the locking plate, and 4 (21%) were fixed by cross-screws. Of the 15 nonunions with plate fixation, 6 (40%) underwent a second surgery due to device failure, while none of the cross-screws required a second surgery. Out of the 6 secondary surgeries, 5 (83%) demonstrated a nonunion with valgus deformity and 1 required removal of hardware due to prominent hardware.

Conclusion: Our results support that a dorsal locking plate for the fusion of a hallux valgus deformity is associated with a significantly higher risk of symptomatic nonunion and a secondary surgery compared to cross-screws, possibly due to the failure of the plate in neutralizing the medio-lateral deforming forces.

Levels of evidence: Level IV, Retrospective Cohort.

钢板固定和拇外翻畸形对第一跖趾关节融合术不愈合率的影响:回顾性队列研究。
背景:固定方式和术前畸形共同影响第一跖趾(MTP)关节融合术后的愈合率。本研究旨在比较背侧锁定钢板与十字螺钉在首次MTP关节融合术中的不愈合和失败率,考虑到术前畸形,包括拇外翻与僵硬。我们的第二个目的是比较观察到的骨不连率和系统评价中的骨不连率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括372名患者和378只脚。除了181例(49%)使用背侧锁定钢板和191例(51%)使用交叉螺钉外,手术技术是相同的。术后3个月评估x线片愈合。随访3个月未愈合者分为“有症状”和“无症状”骨不连。随访3个月后被分类为不愈合的患者,直至愈合。结果:结果表明,背侧锁定钢板固定(OR = 10.1, 95% CI: 1.3-80)和拇外翻畸形(OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.2-18)与较高的不愈合率显著相关。在3个月的随访中,共有19例(5%)患者出现骨不连。在所有骨不连中,15例(79%)采用锁定钢板固定,4例(21%)采用十字螺钉固定。在钢板固定的15例骨不连中,6例(40%)因装置失效而接受了第二次手术,而十字螺钉不需要第二次手术。在6例继发手术中,5例(83%)表现为骨不愈合伴外翻畸形,1例因内固定突出需要取出内固定物。结论:我们的研究结果支持,与交叉螺钉相比,背侧锁定钢板用于拇外翻畸形融合与症状性骨不连和二次手术的风险明显更高,可能是由于钢板无法中和中外侧变形力。证据等级:IV级,回顾性队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信