Reassessing socioeconomic inequalities in mortality via distributional similarities.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ana C Gómez-Ugarte, Ugofilippo Basellini, Carlo G Camarda, Fanny Janssen, Emilio Zagheni
{"title":"Reassessing socioeconomic inequalities in mortality via distributional similarities.","authors":"Ana C Gómez-Ugarte, Ugofilippo Basellini, Carlo G Camarda, Fanny Janssen, Emilio Zagheni","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00365-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Commonly used measures of socioeconomic inequalities in mortality, such as the slope and the relative index of inequality, are based on summary measures of the group-specific age-at-death distributions (e.g. standardized mortality rate or life expectancy). While this approach is informative, it ignores valuable information contained in the group-specific distributions. A recent approach applied a measure of distributional dissimilarity (the non-overlap index) to measure lifespan stratification. In this paper, we rigorously evaluate and further implement the multi-group extension of the non-overlap index ( <math><msup><mi>S</mi> <mi>P</mi></msup> </math> ) to measure socioeconomic inequalities in mortality across a number of groups, and assess whether differences across countries and over time are driven by mortality or compositional changes in two applications with different data availability: educational groups (Sweden and Denmark) and groups defined by an area-level deprivation measure (England). Our findings suggest that the multi-group <math><msup><mi>S</mi> <mi>P</mi></msup> </math> is sensitive not only to changes in the means or variances, but also to broader mortality changes that affect distributional shapes. The method can be employed to any context where mortality rates by age are available by sub-groups. Furthermore, levels and trends in mortality inequalities computed with the multigroup <math><msup><mi>S</mi> <mi>P</mi></msup> </math> often differ compared to other conventional summary-based measures. Moreover, we find that the contribution of mortality changes to changes in inequalities is generally greater than that of the changes in the population composition. Whereas levels and trends of inequalities may depend on whether life expectancy- or lifespan variation-based measures are employed, the multi-group <math><msup><mi>S</mi> <mi>P</mi></msup> </math> provides a holistic perspective by capturing both dimensions simultaneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00365-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commonly used measures of socioeconomic inequalities in mortality, such as the slope and the relative index of inequality, are based on summary measures of the group-specific age-at-death distributions (e.g. standardized mortality rate or life expectancy). While this approach is informative, it ignores valuable information contained in the group-specific distributions. A recent approach applied a measure of distributional dissimilarity (the non-overlap index) to measure lifespan stratification. In this paper, we rigorously evaluate and further implement the multi-group extension of the non-overlap index ( S P ) to measure socioeconomic inequalities in mortality across a number of groups, and assess whether differences across countries and over time are driven by mortality or compositional changes in two applications with different data availability: educational groups (Sweden and Denmark) and groups defined by an area-level deprivation measure (England). Our findings suggest that the multi-group S P is sensitive not only to changes in the means or variances, but also to broader mortality changes that affect distributional shapes. The method can be employed to any context where mortality rates by age are available by sub-groups. Furthermore, levels and trends in mortality inequalities computed with the multigroup S P often differ compared to other conventional summary-based measures. Moreover, we find that the contribution of mortality changes to changes in inequalities is generally greater than that of the changes in the population composition. Whereas levels and trends of inequalities may depend on whether life expectancy- or lifespan variation-based measures are employed, the multi-group S P provides a holistic perspective by capturing both dimensions simultaneously.

通过分布相似性重新评估死亡率的社会经济不平等。
衡量死亡率社会经济不平等的常用措施,如斜率和不平等相对指数,是根据对特定群体死亡年龄分布(如标准化死亡率或预期寿命)的汇总措施制定的。虽然这种方法提供了信息,但它忽略了特定于组的分布中包含的有价值的信息。最近的一种方法应用了分布不相似性(非重叠指数)来衡量寿命分层。在本文中,我们严格评估并进一步实施了非重叠指数(S P)的多组扩展,以衡量多个群体中死亡率的社会经济不平等,并评估了两种不同数据可用性的应用程序中的不同国家和不同时间的差异是否由死亡率或构成变化驱动:教育群体(瑞典和丹麦)和由地区水平剥夺措施定义的群体(英国)。我们的研究结果表明,多组S - P不仅对均值或方差的变化敏感,而且对影响分布形状的更广泛的死亡率变化也敏感。该方法可用于任何可获得按年龄分组死亡率的情况。此外,与其他传统的基于汇总的测量方法相比,用多组标准普尔计算的死亡率不平等的水平和趋势往往不同。此外,我们发现死亡率变化对不平等变化的贡献通常大于人口构成变化的贡献。不平等的水平和趋势可能取决于是否采用了基于预期寿命或寿命变化的衡量标准,而多组标准普尔同时捕捉了这两个维度,从而提供了一个整体视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信