Incidence of engraftment syndrome with and without budesonide prophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplant.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lucy Gloe, Alexandria Rakestraw, Stephanie Daniels, Xianyan Chen, Vamsi Kota, Amber B Clemmons
{"title":"Incidence of engraftment syndrome with and without budesonide prophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplant.","authors":"Lucy Gloe, Alexandria Rakestraw, Stephanie Daniels, Xianyan Chen, Vamsi Kota, Amber B Clemmons","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09285-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Engraftment syndrome (ES), a rare post-transplant complication, has been defined differently across the literature. This study aims to determine if budesonide prophylaxis reduces ES after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), as defined by the published Spitzer or Maiolino criteria or by the ES definition used by Dhakal et al. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was conducted on adult patients who received auto-HCT for MM between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients were divided into those who did not receive budesonide prophylaxis (n = 169) versus those who did (n = 144). The primary endpoint was an incidence of ES by the definition used by Spitzer, Maiolino, and Dhakal et al., respectively. Secondary endpoints included receipt of steroids to treat ES, hospital length of stay, engraftment, and 30- and 100-day mortality rates. Exploratory endpoints were antibiotics started in the peri-engraftment period and number of anti-diarrheal and anti-emetic doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference existed between groups in the primary outcome by the ES definition used by Spitzer, Maiolino, or Dhakal et al. (all p > 0.05). Further, no difference existed with respect to any secondary outcomes (all p > 0.05) except a lower incidence of receipt of antibiotics in the peri-engraftment period for those who received budesonide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest concordance between Spitzer and Maiolino criteria with clinically documented ES, with higher incidences when the ES definition used by Dhakal et al. is utilized. Larger controlled trials need to be performed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09285-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Engraftment syndrome (ES), a rare post-transplant complication, has been defined differently across the literature. This study aims to determine if budesonide prophylaxis reduces ES after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), as defined by the published Spitzer or Maiolino criteria or by the ES definition used by Dhakal et al. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was conducted on adult patients who received auto-HCT for MM between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients were divided into those who did not receive budesonide prophylaxis (n = 169) versus those who did (n = 144). The primary endpoint was an incidence of ES by the definition used by Spitzer, Maiolino, and Dhakal et al., respectively. Secondary endpoints included receipt of steroids to treat ES, hospital length of stay, engraftment, and 30- and 100-day mortality rates. Exploratory endpoints were antibiotics started in the peri-engraftment period and number of anti-diarrheal and anti-emetic doses.

Results: No difference existed between groups in the primary outcome by the ES definition used by Spitzer, Maiolino, or Dhakal et al. (all p > 0.05). Further, no difference existed with respect to any secondary outcomes (all p > 0.05) except a lower incidence of receipt of antibiotics in the peri-engraftment period for those who received budesonide.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest concordance between Spitzer and Maiolino criteria with clinically documented ES, with higher incidences when the ES definition used by Dhakal et al. is utilized. Larger controlled trials need to be performed to validate these findings.

接受自体干细胞移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者在使用和不使用布地奈德预防剂的情况下发生移植综合征的几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信