{"title":"A new cut-off value of FRAX tools as an osteoporosis screening tool for Thai geriatric population.","authors":"Apichat Asavamongkolkul, Nath Adulkasem, Ekasame Vanitcharoenkul, Chandhanarat Chandhanayingyong, Panai Laohaprasitiporn, Krabkaew Soparat, Pojchong Chotiyarnwong, Aasis Unnanuntana","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-90594-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying osteoporosis in geriatric populations is essential for fragility fracture prevention. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis, its availability and cost for mass screening are limited. This study aims to determine an effective fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) cut-off value for screening osteoporosis in the Thai geriatric population. The demographic data, FRAX hip fracture (HF), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and Bone mineral density (BMD) of community-dwelling Thai adults aged ≥ 60 years, conducted between March 2021 to August 2022 were analyzed. Osteoporosis is defined as a BMD T-score ≤ - 2.5. The accuracy of FRAX in identifying osteoporosis was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among 2991 participants (average age 69.2 ± 6.5 years), the discriminative ability was acceptable for both FRAX hip fracture (HF) (AUC = 0.75) and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (AUC = 0.72). A cut-off value of 1.5 for FRAX HF and 4.5 for FRAX MOF demonstrated excellent sensitivity (90.4%) and a high negative predictive value (89.7%) in osteoporosis detection. This study identifies FRAX cut-off values that can effectively screen for high-risk osteoporosis in the Thai geriatric population and suggests that FRAX could be a valuable tool for initial osteoporosis screening in Thai seniors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"6466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90594-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identifying osteoporosis in geriatric populations is essential for fragility fracture prevention. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis, its availability and cost for mass screening are limited. This study aims to determine an effective fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) cut-off value for screening osteoporosis in the Thai geriatric population. The demographic data, FRAX hip fracture (HF), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and Bone mineral density (BMD) of community-dwelling Thai adults aged ≥ 60 years, conducted between March 2021 to August 2022 were analyzed. Osteoporosis is defined as a BMD T-score ≤ - 2.5. The accuracy of FRAX in identifying osteoporosis was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among 2991 participants (average age 69.2 ± 6.5 years), the discriminative ability was acceptable for both FRAX hip fracture (HF) (AUC = 0.75) and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (AUC = 0.72). A cut-off value of 1.5 for FRAX HF and 4.5 for FRAX MOF demonstrated excellent sensitivity (90.4%) and a high negative predictive value (89.7%) in osteoporosis detection. This study identifies FRAX cut-off values that can effectively screen for high-risk osteoporosis in the Thai geriatric population and suggests that FRAX could be a valuable tool for initial osteoporosis screening in Thai seniors.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.