Rachel L Brown, Gilbert Thomas-Black, Hector Garcia-Moreno, Michael Chou, Zofia Fleszar, Michael S Zandi, Miles Chapman, Andrew J Church, Melanie Hart, Paola Giunti, Angela Vincent, Michael P Lunn
{"title":"GAD antibodies in neurological disease: a critical evaluation of the utility and treatment implications of GAD antibodies in clinical practice.","authors":"Rachel L Brown, Gilbert Thomas-Black, Hector Garcia-Moreno, Michael Chou, Zofia Fleszar, Michael S Zandi, Miles Chapman, Andrew J Church, Melanie Hart, Paola Giunti, Angela Vincent, Michael P Lunn","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12926-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interpretation of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD-Abs) in neurological practice is challenging. GAD-Abs are not considered directly pathogenic and immunotherapy guidelines are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a single-center retrospective service evaluation of GAD-Abs, documenting clinical features, immunotherapy responses, and outcomes of 335 patients with positive GAD-Abs measured by indirect ELISA between 2012 and 2020. The serum:CSF ratio of GAD-Ab values was used as a surrogate for intrathecal synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>168 (50%) patients had diagnosed neurological disorders (GAD-ND). Ninety-six had neurological disorders often or sometimes associated with GAD-Abs, i.e., stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders (SPS-SD, n = 26), cerebellar ataxia (n = 21), epilepsy (n = 19), encephalitis (n = 18), or any combination of these (\"mixed\", n = 12). Seventy-two had other neurological disorders (ONDs) not typically associated with GAD-Abs. We defined a cut-off of 10,000 IU/mL a priori and a posteriori for GAD-Ab associated NDs, but identified values > 10,000 IU/mL in 21% and 11% of patients with ONDs or diabetes respectively, and < 10,000 IU/mL in 39% patients with classical GAD-Ab syndromes, indicating low assay specificity and sensitivity. Low serum: CSF GAD-Ab ratios were consistent with intrathecal synthesis in 12/19 tested; 25/54 patients had oligoclonal bands. 30/50 patients given adequate immunotherapies had partial (n = 17) or good (n = 13) responses, particularly those with SPS-SD or limbic encephalitis. Within the limitations of small subgroups and routine laboratory titrations, patients with GAD-Ab values > 10,000 IU/mL, intrathecal synthesis of GAD-Abs, or oligoclonal bands, were not more likely to improve with immunotherapies than those with GAD-Ab values < 10,000 IU/mL and a non-inflammatory CSF. Rather, treatment response correlated with disease group, principally SPS-SD and encephalitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest caution in over-interpreting GAD-Abs values. Better biomarkers for identifying patients with immunotherapy responsive GAD-Ab disease are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12926-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The interpretation of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD-Abs) in neurological practice is challenging. GAD-Abs are not considered directly pathogenic and immunotherapy guidelines are lacking.
Methods: We undertook a single-center retrospective service evaluation of GAD-Abs, documenting clinical features, immunotherapy responses, and outcomes of 335 patients with positive GAD-Abs measured by indirect ELISA between 2012 and 2020. The serum:CSF ratio of GAD-Ab values was used as a surrogate for intrathecal synthesis.
Results: 168 (50%) patients had diagnosed neurological disorders (GAD-ND). Ninety-six had neurological disorders often or sometimes associated with GAD-Abs, i.e., stiff person syndrome spectrum disorders (SPS-SD, n = 26), cerebellar ataxia (n = 21), epilepsy (n = 19), encephalitis (n = 18), or any combination of these ("mixed", n = 12). Seventy-two had other neurological disorders (ONDs) not typically associated with GAD-Abs. We defined a cut-off of 10,000 IU/mL a priori and a posteriori for GAD-Ab associated NDs, but identified values > 10,000 IU/mL in 21% and 11% of patients with ONDs or diabetes respectively, and < 10,000 IU/mL in 39% patients with classical GAD-Ab syndromes, indicating low assay specificity and sensitivity. Low serum: CSF GAD-Ab ratios were consistent with intrathecal synthesis in 12/19 tested; 25/54 patients had oligoclonal bands. 30/50 patients given adequate immunotherapies had partial (n = 17) or good (n = 13) responses, particularly those with SPS-SD or limbic encephalitis. Within the limitations of small subgroups and routine laboratory titrations, patients with GAD-Ab values > 10,000 IU/mL, intrathecal synthesis of GAD-Abs, or oligoclonal bands, were not more likely to improve with immunotherapies than those with GAD-Ab values < 10,000 IU/mL and a non-inflammatory CSF. Rather, treatment response correlated with disease group, principally SPS-SD and encephalitis.
Conclusions: These results suggest caution in over-interpreting GAD-Abs values. Better biomarkers for identifying patients with immunotherapy responsive GAD-Ab disease are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.