Decoding Codon Usage Patterns in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genomes: A Comprehensive Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Jiahuan Ren, Qijia Li, Weifeng Shen, Xiaochun Tan
{"title":"Decoding Codon Usage Patterns in High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genomes: A Comprehensive Analysis.","authors":"Jiahuan Ren, Qijia Li, Weifeng Shen, Xiaochun Tan","doi":"10.1007/s00284-025-04131-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a major contributor to various human cancers, particularly cervical cancer. Despite its significant impact, the codon usage bias in high-risk HPV types has not been extensively studied. Understanding this bias, however, could provide valuable insights into the virus itself and inform the optimization of vaccine design. This study explores codon usage bias within the genomes of 17 high-risk HPV types (HPV-16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, and 82) through comparative analysis. While overall codon usage preference across these genotypes is not highly significant, a notable trend emerges in the preference for codons ending in A or U, with 24 out of 26 favored codons (Relative Synonymous Codon Usage > 1) ending in A or U. Moreover, no common optimal codons are shared among the 17 genomes. The study also identifies the underrepresentation of CpG and ApA dinucleotides, alongside the overrepresentation of CpA and UpG, which likely contribute to codon usage preferences that may influence viral replication and immune evasion strategies. Integrated analysis further suggests that natural selection is the primary force driving codon usage bias in these high-risk HPV genomes. Additionally, these HPVs exhibit a limited set of favored codons shared with humans, potentially minimizing competition for translation resources. This study offers new insights into codon usage bias in high-risk HPVs and underscores the importance of this understanding for optimizing vaccine design.</p>","PeriodicalId":11360,"journal":{"name":"Current Microbiology","volume":"82 4","pages":"148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04131-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a major contributor to various human cancers, particularly cervical cancer. Despite its significant impact, the codon usage bias in high-risk HPV types has not been extensively studied. Understanding this bias, however, could provide valuable insights into the virus itself and inform the optimization of vaccine design. This study explores codon usage bias within the genomes of 17 high-risk HPV types (HPV-16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, and 82) through comparative analysis. While overall codon usage preference across these genotypes is not highly significant, a notable trend emerges in the preference for codons ending in A or U, with 24 out of 26 favored codons (Relative Synonymous Codon Usage > 1) ending in A or U. Moreover, no common optimal codons are shared among the 17 genomes. The study also identifies the underrepresentation of CpG and ApA dinucleotides, alongside the overrepresentation of CpA and UpG, which likely contribute to codon usage preferences that may influence viral replication and immune evasion strategies. Integrated analysis further suggests that natural selection is the primary force driving codon usage bias in these high-risk HPV genomes. Additionally, these HPVs exhibit a limited set of favored codons shared with humans, potentially minimizing competition for translation resources. This study offers new insights into codon usage bias in high-risk HPVs and underscores the importance of this understanding for optimizing vaccine design.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Microbiology
Current Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Current Microbiology is a well-established journal that publishes articles in all aspects of microbial cells and the interactions between the microorganisms, their hosts and the environment. Current Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor, spanning the following areas: physiology, biochemistry, genetics, genomics, biotechnology, ecology, evolution, morphology, taxonomy, diagnostic methods, medical and clinical microbiology and immunology as applied to microorganisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信