Peng Zhang , Yi Liu , Xinyun Zhou , Yinyu Chen , Liudi Pan , Feiyi Xu , Xiaolong Zhang , Lisong Shen , Hui Chen
{"title":"Evaluation of a multiplexed assay for six urinary proteins based on liquid microarray analysis technology","authors":"Peng Zhang , Yi Liu , Xinyun Zhou , Yinyu Chen , Liudi Pan , Feiyi Xu , Xiaolong Zhang , Lisong Shen , Hui Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2025.115820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proteinuria serves as a critical indicator in the progression of chronic kidney disease. The quantification of urinary protein is instrumental in diagnosing kidney disease and monitoring therapeutic efficacy. Nephelometry and turbidimetric immunoassay are predominantly employed for the quantitative detection of various urinary proteins. We developed a quantitative detection method for six proteins in urine utilizing the flow fluorescence luminescence method on the Luminex®200™ detection platform. This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance and accuracy of the method. The sensitivity, precision, recovery, linearity, and interference metrics for the method meet the needs of clinical applications. The correlation coefficient (r) between the results of the method and nephelometry immunoassay on SIEMENS BNII platform ranged from 0.9375 to 0.9847, indicating a strong linear relationship. The results of the Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the systematic bias between the two methods was minimal. Additionally, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, both including and excluding outliers, was conducted on the clinical trial data. The findings demonstrated consistency between the two methods, with the expected confidence interval of bias remaining within the allowable error limits, indicating no significant discrepancy. This urine six protein quantification method demonstrates satisfactory performance, meeting the standards necessary for medical diagnosis and clinical application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":"701 ","pages":"Article 115820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269725000582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Proteinuria serves as a critical indicator in the progression of chronic kidney disease. The quantification of urinary protein is instrumental in diagnosing kidney disease and monitoring therapeutic efficacy. Nephelometry and turbidimetric immunoassay are predominantly employed for the quantitative detection of various urinary proteins. We developed a quantitative detection method for six proteins in urine utilizing the flow fluorescence luminescence method on the Luminex®200™ detection platform. This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance and accuracy of the method. The sensitivity, precision, recovery, linearity, and interference metrics for the method meet the needs of clinical applications. The correlation coefficient (r) between the results of the method and nephelometry immunoassay on SIEMENS BNII platform ranged from 0.9375 to 0.9847, indicating a strong linear relationship. The results of the Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the systematic bias between the two methods was minimal. Additionally, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, both including and excluding outliers, was conducted on the clinical trial data. The findings demonstrated consistency between the two methods, with the expected confidence interval of bias remaining within the allowable error limits, indicating no significant discrepancy. This urine six protein quantification method demonstrates satisfactory performance, meeting the standards necessary for medical diagnosis and clinical application.
期刊介绍:
The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field.
The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology.
The journal has been particularly active in:
-Analytical techniques for biological molecules-
Aptamer selection and utilization-
Biosensors-
Chromatography-
Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis-
Electrochemical methods-
Electrophoresis-
Enzyme characterization methods-
Immunological approaches-
Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids-
Metabolomics-
Nano level techniques-
Optical spectroscopy in all its forms.
The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.