{"title":"Effect of chlorine atoms on inhibition effect between amide herbicides and urease enzyme: molecular mechanism and structure-activity relationship.","authors":"Xiaoning Wang, Wenyue Wang, Jingyan Lin, Yongkun Wu, Yuhan Zhao, Jiayin Ding, Shan Hong, Ziheng Wan, Kaipeng Sun, Dong Chen, Yizhen Tang, Yihua Xiao, Weihua Zhao, Haofen Sun, Weiliang Wang, Chuanxi Yang","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amide herbicides (AHs) disturbed urease (UA) activity and soil microbial community and caused soil nutrient changes. Activity of UA was inhibited by AHs via groups of chlorine, benzene ring, and peptide bond (-N-/-CO-). Differences of surface charge distribution were mainly derived from position to connected -Cl, distance of -O- from ether group and -N from peptide bond, difference of structure/length for hydrocarbon chain, and different regions of negative charge enrichment. Developmental toxicity for alachlor was strongest related to smaller structure and weaker steric hindrance effect; mutagenicity for propanil was weakest possibly related to missing ether group. Molecular mechanism and structural activity relationship for inhibition of AHs and UA were based on functional groups, amino acids with high frequency, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, binding area (BA) of butachlor (396.3 Å2), absolute value of binding energy (|BE|) of propanil (2.93 kJ/mol; which was highest), and quantitative structural relationship between BA and |BE|, which was negative correlation. Binding area for AHs and UA had negative correlation for density with correlation coefficient (r) as -0.937 (p ≤ 0.01). Absolute value of binding energy for AHs and UA had positive correlation for density with r as 0.847 (p ≤ 0.05), and negative correlation for molecular weight with r as -0.973 (p ≤ 0.001). Results provided technological support and theoretical foundation for toxic effects of soil enzyme activity, health effects, risk regulation, and control of AHs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1334-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Amide herbicides (AHs) disturbed urease (UA) activity and soil microbial community and caused soil nutrient changes. Activity of UA was inhibited by AHs via groups of chlorine, benzene ring, and peptide bond (-N-/-CO-). Differences of surface charge distribution were mainly derived from position to connected -Cl, distance of -O- from ether group and -N from peptide bond, difference of structure/length for hydrocarbon chain, and different regions of negative charge enrichment. Developmental toxicity for alachlor was strongest related to smaller structure and weaker steric hindrance effect; mutagenicity for propanil was weakest possibly related to missing ether group. Molecular mechanism and structural activity relationship for inhibition of AHs and UA were based on functional groups, amino acids with high frequency, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, binding area (BA) of butachlor (396.3 Å2), absolute value of binding energy (|BE|) of propanil (2.93 kJ/mol; which was highest), and quantitative structural relationship between BA and |BE|, which was negative correlation. Binding area for AHs and UA had negative correlation for density with correlation coefficient (r) as -0.937 (p ≤ 0.01). Absolute value of binding energy for AHs and UA had positive correlation for density with r as 0.847 (p ≤ 0.05), and negative correlation for molecular weight with r as -0.973 (p ≤ 0.001). Results provided technological support and theoretical foundation for toxic effects of soil enzyme activity, health effects, risk regulation, and control of AHs.
酰胺类除草剂(AHs)干扰了脲酶(UA)活性和土壤微生物群落,引起土壤养分变化。AHs通过氯基团、苯环基团、肽键(- n -/- co -)抑制UA活性。表面电荷分布的差异主要来源于- cl的位置、- o -与醚基团的距离、- n与肽键的距离、烃链结构/长度的差异以及负电荷富集区域的不同。甲草胺的发育毒性最强与结构较小、位阻效应较弱有关,丙烯的致突变性最弱与缺失醚基团有关。基于官能团、高频氨基酸、氢键、疏水相互作用、丁草胺结合面积(BA) (396.3 Å2)、丙烯结合能(|BE|)绝对值(2.93 kJ/mol)(最高)、BA与|BE|的定量结构关系(|BE|为负相关)抑制AHs和UA的分子机理和结构活性关系。AHs与UA的BA与密度呈负相关,相关系数(r)为-0.937 (p≤0.01)。AHs和UA的|与密度呈正相关,r为0.847 (p≤0.05),与分子量(MW)呈负相关,r为-0.973 (p≤0.001)。研究结果为SEs活性的毒性效应、健康效应、AHs风险调控提供了技术支持和理论依据。
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.