Comparative safety analysis of coseasonal versus preseasonal Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Ying Liu, Feng Chen, Ning Wang, Chan He, Chunyan Tian, Yan Feng, Hui HuangFu
{"title":"Comparative safety analysis of coseasonal versus preseasonal Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis.","authors":"Ying Liu, Feng Chen, Ning Wang, Chan He, Chunyan Tian, Yan Feng, Hui HuangFu","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09262-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) usually seek treatment when symptoms become unbearable during the pollen season. It remains unclear whether initiating sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during the pollen season affects patients' safety. This study aims to compare the tolerability of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season versus before the season.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety patients with Artemisia-induced SAR were recruited and equally randomized into the coseasonal initiation treatment (COS-SLIT) group and the preseasonal initiation treatment (PRE-SLIT) group. The COS-SLIT group started SLIT when allergic symptoms occurred during the 2022 pollen season, while the PRE-SLIT group began SLIT four months before the expected season in 2022. Patients were categorized as mild symptoms or moderate-severe symptoms group based on the level of visual analog scale (VAS) scores evaluated during the 2021 pollen season. The incidence, frequency, performance, and alleviating measures of adverse events (AEs) were analyzed after the up-dosing phase (5 weeks), at three months (13 weeks), six months (26 weeks), and twelve months (52 weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 patients (32 patients in the COS-SLIT group and 40 patients in the PRE-SLIT) were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 33 reported a total of 78 AEs. No significant difference was found in the frequency and number of patients experiencing AEs between the COS-SLIT and PRE-SLIT groups during the four follow-up periods (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the symptoms or alleviating measures of AEs between the two groups in general (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, the most common AEs in the COS-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 14), lip edema (n = 10), and cough (n = 4), while in the PRE-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 12), lip edema (n = 8), and ocular pruritus (n = 6). Symptomatic drugs were the most common alleviating measures in both groups (61.29% in COS-SLIT and 64.52% in PRE-SLIT, p > 0.05). Patients with mild and moderate-severe symptoms showed comparable tolerability at different initiation timing (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This prospective study demonstrates the comparable safety and tolerability of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season and before the season.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"1941-1950"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09262-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) usually seek treatment when symptoms become unbearable during the pollen season. It remains unclear whether initiating sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) during the pollen season affects patients' safety. This study aims to compare the tolerability of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season versus before the season.

Methods: Ninety patients with Artemisia-induced SAR were recruited and equally randomized into the coseasonal initiation treatment (COS-SLIT) group and the preseasonal initiation treatment (PRE-SLIT) group. The COS-SLIT group started SLIT when allergic symptoms occurred during the 2022 pollen season, while the PRE-SLIT group began SLIT four months before the expected season in 2022. Patients were categorized as mild symptoms or moderate-severe symptoms group based on the level of visual analog scale (VAS) scores evaluated during the 2021 pollen season. The incidence, frequency, performance, and alleviating measures of adverse events (AEs) were analyzed after the up-dosing phase (5 weeks), at three months (13 weeks), six months (26 weeks), and twelve months (52 weeks).

Results: A total of 72 patients (32 patients in the COS-SLIT group and 40 patients in the PRE-SLIT) were included in the analysis. Among these patients, 33 reported a total of 78 AEs. No significant difference was found in the frequency and number of patients experiencing AEs between the COS-SLIT and PRE-SLIT groups during the four follow-up periods (all p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the symptoms or alleviating measures of AEs between the two groups in general (all p > 0.05). Furthermore, the most common AEs in the COS-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 14), lip edema (n = 10), and cough (n = 4), while in the PRE-SLIT group were nasal symptoms (n = 12), lip edema (n = 8), and ocular pruritus (n = 6). Symptomatic drugs were the most common alleviating measures in both groups (61.29% in COS-SLIT and 64.52% in PRE-SLIT, p > 0.05). Patients with mild and moderate-severe symptoms showed comparable tolerability at different initiation timing (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: This prospective study demonstrates the comparable safety and tolerability of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season and before the season.

同季节与季节前青蒿舌下免疫治疗变应性鼻炎的安全性比较分析。
目的:季节性变应性鼻炎(SAR)患者通常在花粉季节症状难以忍受时寻求治疗。目前尚不清楚在花粉季节开始舌下免疫治疗(SLIT)是否会影响患者的安全性。本研究旨在比较黄花蒿在花粉季节与花粉季节前启动SLIT的耐受性。方法:招募90例青蒿诱导SAR患者,随机分为同季节启动治疗组(COS-SLIT)和季节前启动治疗组(PRE-SLIT)。COS-SLIT组在2022年花粉季节出现过敏症状时开始SLIT,而PRE-SLIT组在2022年预期季节前4个月开始SLIT。根据2021年花粉季节评估的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分水平将患者分为轻度症状组或中度重度症状组。在增加剂量期(5周)、3个月(13周)、6个月(26周)和12个月(52周)分别分析不良事件(ae)的发生率、频率、表现和缓解措施。结果:共纳入72例患者,其中COS-SLIT组32例,PRE-SLIT组40例。在这些患者中,33例报告了78例ae。在4个随访期间,COS-SLIT组和PRE-SLIT组发生ae的频率和数量无显著差异(均p < 0.05)。两组患者的ae症状或缓解措施总体上无显著差异(p < 0.05)。此外,COS-SLIT组最常见的ae是鼻腔症状(n = 14)、嘴唇水肿(n = 10)和咳嗽(n = 4),而预slit组最常见的ae是鼻腔症状(n = 12)、嘴唇水肿(n = 8)和眼部瘙痒(n = 6)。对症药物是两组最常见的缓解措施(COS-SLIT组为61.29%,PRE-SLIT组为64.52%,p < 0.05)。轻度和中重度症状患者在不同起始时间的耐受性相当(p < 0.05)。结论:本前瞻性研究表明,在花粉季和花粉季前启动青蒿SLIT具有相当的安全性和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信