Lower Rates of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Higher Long-term Aortic Mortality in Women Compared With Men: Results of a Population-Based Study Spanning 4 Decades.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Indrani Sen, Jill Colglazier, Jennifer St Sauver, William S Harmsen, Jay Mandrekar, Manju Kalra
{"title":"Lower Rates of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Higher Long-term Aortic Mortality in Women Compared With Men: Results of a Population-Based Study Spanning 4 Decades.","authors":"Indrani Sen, Jill Colglazier, Jennifer St Sauver, William S Harmsen, Jay Mandrekar, Manju Kalra","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.11.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the population-level impact of screening and endovascular repair as well as mortality in women with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients from Olmsted County, Minnesota, in whom AAA was diagnosed between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2017. The AAAs were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions and Current Procedural Terminology codes with medical record review to confirm the diagnosis and identify late events. Survival analysis for overall and aortic mortality was performed and stratified based on sex and repair status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1537 patients in our study cohort (75% [1156] male; median age, 74 years). Compared with men, women were older (80 vs 73 years; P<.001), had smaller initial aneurysm size (4 vs 4.3 cm; P<.001), underwent AAA repair less frequently (26% [99] vs 41% [475]; P<.001), and had similar 30-day mortality from AAA repair (4% [4 of 381] vs 5% [22 of 1156]; P=.50). Median follow-up was 18 years. Aortic and all-cause mortality at 10 and 20 years were highest in females who did not undergo repair (hazard ratio, 3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 4.5; P<.001), as compared with all men and women who underwent AAA repair. Cumulative aortic mortality analyzed with non-aortic-related deaths as a competing risk factor remained significantly higher in NRF (15% [40 of 282] vs 5% to 8% in other groups; 5/99 in females undergoing repair, 39/681 in non repaired males and 37/475 in males who underwent repair, P=.001). All patients with aortic-related mortality had refused repair due to older age and comorbidities, except 2 females with ruptures of 4.8 and 5.5 cm AAAs awaiting repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abdominal aortic aneurysms are diagnosed in women almost a decade later and repaired less often than in men. There is a 3-fold greater long-term aortic-related mortality in women not undergoing AAA repair compared with men and women who underwent AAA repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":18334,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.11.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the population-level impact of screening and endovascular repair as well as mortality in women with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Patients and methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients from Olmsted County, Minnesota, in whom AAA was diagnosed between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2017. The AAAs were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions and Current Procedural Terminology codes with medical record review to confirm the diagnosis and identify late events. Survival analysis for overall and aortic mortality was performed and stratified based on sex and repair status.

Results: There were 1537 patients in our study cohort (75% [1156] male; median age, 74 years). Compared with men, women were older (80 vs 73 years; P<.001), had smaller initial aneurysm size (4 vs 4.3 cm; P<.001), underwent AAA repair less frequently (26% [99] vs 41% [475]; P<.001), and had similar 30-day mortality from AAA repair (4% [4 of 381] vs 5% [22 of 1156]; P=.50). Median follow-up was 18 years. Aortic and all-cause mortality at 10 and 20 years were highest in females who did not undergo repair (hazard ratio, 3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 4.5; P<.001), as compared with all men and women who underwent AAA repair. Cumulative aortic mortality analyzed with non-aortic-related deaths as a competing risk factor remained significantly higher in NRF (15% [40 of 282] vs 5% to 8% in other groups; 5/99 in females undergoing repair, 39/681 in non repaired males and 37/475 in males who underwent repair, P=.001). All patients with aortic-related mortality had refused repair due to older age and comorbidities, except 2 females with ruptures of 4.8 and 5.5 cm AAAs awaiting repair.

Conclusion: Abdominal aortic aneurysms are diagnosed in women almost a decade later and repaired less often than in men. There is a 3-fold greater long-term aortic-related mortality in women not undergoing AAA repair compared with men and women who underwent AAA repair.

与男性相比,女性腹主动脉瘤修复率较低,长期主动脉死亡率较高:一项为期40年的基于人群的研究结果
摘要确定筛查和血管内修复对人群的影响以及腹主动脉瘤(AAA)女性患者的死亡率:我们对明尼苏达州奥姆斯特德县在 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间确诊为 AAA 的患者进行了一项基于人群的队列研究。AAA使用《国际疾病分类》第九版和第十版修订版以及《现行手术术语》代码进行鉴定,并通过病历审查来确认诊断和识别晚期事件。对总死亡率和主动脉死亡率进行了生存分析,并根据性别和修复状态进行了分层:我们的研究队列中有 1537 名患者(75% [1156] 为男性;中位年龄 74 岁)。与男性相比,女性的年龄更大(80 岁对 73 岁;中位年龄 74 岁):女性诊断出腹主动脉瘤的时间比男性晚了近十年,而且修复的次数也比男性少。与男性和接受 AAA 修复的女性相比,未接受 AAA 修复的女性与主动脉相关的长期死亡率高出 3 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings
Mayo Clinic proceedings 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Mayo Clinic Proceedings is a premier peer-reviewed clinical journal in general medicine. Sponsored by Mayo Clinic, it is one of the most widely read and highly cited scientific publications for physicians. Since 1926, Mayo Clinic Proceedings has continuously published articles that focus on clinical medicine and support the professional and educational needs of its readers. The journal welcomes submissions from authors worldwide and includes Nobel-prize-winning research in its content. With an Impact Factor of 8.9, Mayo Clinic Proceedings is ranked #20 out of 167 journals in the Medicine, General and Internal category, placing it in the top 12% of these journals. It invites manuscripts on clinical and laboratory medicine, health care policy and economics, medical education and ethics, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信