Freedom of movement and health of nursing home residents with dementia: an exploratory cross-sectional study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Suzan P van Liempd, Sascha R Bolt, Katrien G Luijkx
{"title":"Freedom of movement and health of nursing home residents with dementia: an exploratory cross-sectional study.","authors":"Suzan P van Liempd, Sascha R Bolt, Katrien G Luijkx","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05774-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Having more freedom of movement may relate to better health in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. Research that tests whether residents in NHs with more freedom of movement are healthier compared to residents in closed NHs is scarce. Also, existing research on freedom of movement does not consider the diverse dimensions of health. This study explored health differences between two groups of nursing home residents with dementia with different levels of freedom of movement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a quantitative cross-sectional design to investigate differences in health between two groups of NH residents with dementia. One group lived in closed NHs (i.e., with closed unit doors) and the other group in semi-open NHs (i.e., with closed NH entrance doors). A total of 124 residents with dementia were recruited from five NHs in the Netherlands, of whom 61 residents lived in semi-open NHs and 63 residents lived in closed NHs. Data were collected using questionnaires to cover health dimensions according to the concept of Positive Health, including quality of life and participation, mental functioning and perception, daily functioning and bodily functions. An analysis of covariance, adjusted for age, gender and type of dementia, was used to examine differences in residents' health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most included residents had Alzheimer's or vascular dementia and 68% were female. No significant demographic differences were observed between the two groups in age, gender, type of dementia, length of stay, length of diagnoses and type of care package (p-values ranged from 0.097 to 0.606). After adjusting for multiple comparisons, there were no significant differences in any of the assessed health dimensions between residents of semi-open nursing homes and those of closed nursing homes, with a significance threshold of p <.004 accounting for the correction for multiple testing (p-values ranged from 0.020 to 0.870).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study found no significant differences in health between residents with dementia in semi-open and closed NHs. These findings contradict earlier research suggesting that more freedom of movement may enhance overall health in this population. Further research, preferably employing longitudinal designs, is necessary to establish causal pathways and identify the underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05774-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Having more freedom of movement may relate to better health in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. Research that tests whether residents in NHs with more freedom of movement are healthier compared to residents in closed NHs is scarce. Also, existing research on freedom of movement does not consider the diverse dimensions of health. This study explored health differences between two groups of nursing home residents with dementia with different levels of freedom of movement.

Methods: We used a quantitative cross-sectional design to investigate differences in health between two groups of NH residents with dementia. One group lived in closed NHs (i.e., with closed unit doors) and the other group in semi-open NHs (i.e., with closed NH entrance doors). A total of 124 residents with dementia were recruited from five NHs in the Netherlands, of whom 61 residents lived in semi-open NHs and 63 residents lived in closed NHs. Data were collected using questionnaires to cover health dimensions according to the concept of Positive Health, including quality of life and participation, mental functioning and perception, daily functioning and bodily functions. An analysis of covariance, adjusted for age, gender and type of dementia, was used to examine differences in residents' health.

Results: Most included residents had Alzheimer's or vascular dementia and 68% were female. No significant demographic differences were observed between the two groups in age, gender, type of dementia, length of stay, length of diagnoses and type of care package (p-values ranged from 0.097 to 0.606). After adjusting for multiple comparisons, there were no significant differences in any of the assessed health dimensions between residents of semi-open nursing homes and those of closed nursing homes, with a significance threshold of p <.004 accounting for the correction for multiple testing (p-values ranged from 0.020 to 0.870).

Conclusions: This exploratory study found no significant differences in health between residents with dementia in semi-open and closed NHs. These findings contradict earlier research suggesting that more freedom of movement may enhance overall health in this population. Further research, preferably employing longitudinal designs, is necessary to establish causal pathways and identify the underlying mechanisms.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信