Decarbonization and electricity price vulnerability

IF 25.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Raul Bajo-Buenestado, Antonio M. Bento, Daniel Kaffine, Zissis E. Marmarelis
{"title":"Decarbonization and electricity price vulnerability","authors":"Raul Bajo-Buenestado, Antonio M. Bento, Daniel Kaffine, Zissis E. Marmarelis","doi":"10.1038/s41893-024-01502-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driven by the need to reduce emissions and transition to sustainable electricity systems, many European countries have substantially increased their share of carbon-free electricity over recent decades. However, the dramatic 2021–2022 surge in natural gas prices—stemming from geopolitical tensions and supply constraints—has sharply elevated electricity prices, highlighting the continued vulnerability of electricity markets to natural gas price shocks and suggesting a persistent dependency on volatile fossil fuel prices. Here we develop a country-specific vulnerability metric and apply it to estimate how natural gas price shocks are transmitted to electricity prices across European markets. We find that countries that pursued more aggressive electricity decarbonization are not more vulnerable to natural gas price shocks. However, countries with a higher share of intermittent renewable energy generation (wind and solar) are slightly more vulnerable, potentially due to the complementarity of these technologies with natural gas generation. We show that heterogeneity in vulnerability implies that country-specific policies would be needed to avoid extreme electricity prices, in contrast to the existing uniform EU price cap. Our results emphasize that decarbonization goals can still be achieved without risking vulnerability, which is critical for maintaining stable electricity prices, energy security and public trust in the energy transition. The sudden electricity price increase in Europe in 2021 raised concerns about the ability of power markets to withstand energy price shocks without compromising climate goals. This study shows that countries with larger shares of decarbonized electricity were not more exposed to natural gas price shocks.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"8 2","pages":"170-181"},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01502-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driven by the need to reduce emissions and transition to sustainable electricity systems, many European countries have substantially increased their share of carbon-free electricity over recent decades. However, the dramatic 2021–2022 surge in natural gas prices—stemming from geopolitical tensions and supply constraints—has sharply elevated electricity prices, highlighting the continued vulnerability of electricity markets to natural gas price shocks and suggesting a persistent dependency on volatile fossil fuel prices. Here we develop a country-specific vulnerability metric and apply it to estimate how natural gas price shocks are transmitted to electricity prices across European markets. We find that countries that pursued more aggressive electricity decarbonization are not more vulnerable to natural gas price shocks. However, countries with a higher share of intermittent renewable energy generation (wind and solar) are slightly more vulnerable, potentially due to the complementarity of these technologies with natural gas generation. We show that heterogeneity in vulnerability implies that country-specific policies would be needed to avoid extreme electricity prices, in contrast to the existing uniform EU price cap. Our results emphasize that decarbonization goals can still be achieved without risking vulnerability, which is critical for maintaining stable electricity prices, energy security and public trust in the energy transition. The sudden electricity price increase in Europe in 2021 raised concerns about the ability of power markets to withstand energy price shocks without compromising climate goals. This study shows that countries with larger shares of decarbonized electricity were not more exposed to natural gas price shocks.

Abstract Image

脱碳与电价脆弱性
在减少排放和向可持续电力系统过渡的需求的推动下,近几十年来,许多欧洲国家大幅增加了无碳电力的份额。然而,由于地缘政治紧张局势和供应限制,天然气价格在2021-2022年大幅飙升,导致电价大幅上涨,凸显了电力市场对天然气价格冲击的脆弱性,并表明了对波动的化石燃料价格的持续依赖。在这里,我们制定了一个针对特定国家的脆弱性指标,并将其应用于估计天然气价格冲击如何传导到整个欧洲市场的电价。我们发现,追求更积极的电力脱碳的国家并不更容易受到天然气价格冲击的影响。然而,间歇性可再生能源发电(风能和太阳能)份额较高的国家略显脆弱,这可能是由于这些技术与天然气发电的互补性。我们的研究表明,脆弱性的异质性意味着,与现有的统一的欧盟价格上限相比,需要针对具体国家的政策来避免极端电价。我们的研究结果强调,脱碳目标仍然可以在不冒脆弱性风险的情况下实现,这对于维持稳定的电价、能源安全和能源转型中的公众信任至关重要。2021年欧洲电价突然上涨引发了人们对电力市场在不影响气候目标的情况下承受能源价格冲击的能力的担忧。这项研究表明,脱碳电力份额较大的国家并没有更多地受到天然气价格冲击的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信