Renal clearance estimated by rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography and technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine clearance infusion technique

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Stine Sundgaard Langaa, Camilla Lundgreen Duus, Marie Houmaa Vrist, Frank Holden Mose, Claire Anne Fynbo, Jørn Theil, June Anita Ejlersen, Jesper Nørgaard Bech
{"title":"Renal clearance estimated by rubidium-82 positron emission tomography/computed tomography and technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine clearance infusion technique","authors":"Stine Sundgaard Langaa,&nbsp;Camilla Lundgreen Duus,&nbsp;Marie Houmaa Vrist,&nbsp;Frank Holden Mose,&nbsp;Claire Anne Fynbo,&nbsp;Jørn Theil,&nbsp;June Anita Ejlersen,&nbsp;Jesper Nørgaard Bech","doi":"10.1111/cpf.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although numerous techniques exist for renal blood flow (RBF) estimation, none of the methods have been implemented in routine clinical practice due to their inadequacies and burdensomeness. Previously, we evaluated rubidium-82 (<sup>82</sup>Rb) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for renal perfusion determination and found strong indications of method precision and reliability. The aim of this study was to compare renal <sup>82</sup>Rb clearance with renal technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine ([<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MAG3) clearance as a first attempt to validate <sup>82</sup>Rb PET/CT for renal perfusion estimation using a reference method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ten subjects with essential hypertension underwent two treatment periods, receiving spironolactone and placebo in random order. At the end of each period, each subject completed a <sup>82</sup>Rb PET/CT scan and a [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MAG3 clearance study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p><sup>82</sup>Rb clearance correlated positively with [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MAG3 clearance in both treatment periods. The [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MAG3-to-<sup>82</sup>Rb clearance ratio was 0.83 and 0.86 in the placebo and spironolactone treatment periods, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The correlation between <sup>82</sup>Rb clearance and [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MAG3 clearance may indicate that PET/CT determined <sup>82</sup>Rb clearance can act as an estimator of renal perfusion. The [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MAG3-to-<sup>82</sup>Rb clearance ratios suggest that the extraction fraction of <sup>82</sup>Rb is higher than that of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-MAG3, further suggesting <sup>82</sup>Rb clearance as an estimator of flow. However, further studies are warranted to validate use of <sup>82</sup>Rb PET/CT for flow estimation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cpf.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although numerous techniques exist for renal blood flow (RBF) estimation, none of the methods have been implemented in routine clinical practice due to their inadequacies and burdensomeness. Previously, we evaluated rubidium-82 (82Rb) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for renal perfusion determination and found strong indications of method precision and reliability. The aim of this study was to compare renal 82Rb clearance with renal technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine ([99mTc]Tc-MAG3) clearance as a first attempt to validate 82Rb PET/CT for renal perfusion estimation using a reference method.

Methods

Ten subjects with essential hypertension underwent two treatment periods, receiving spironolactone and placebo in random order. At the end of each period, each subject completed a 82Rb PET/CT scan and a [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 clearance study.

Results

82Rb clearance correlated positively with [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 clearance in both treatment periods. The [99mTc]Tc-MAG3-to-82Rb clearance ratio was 0.83 and 0.86 in the placebo and spironolactone treatment periods, respectively.

Conclusion

The correlation between 82Rb clearance and [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 clearance may indicate that PET/CT determined 82Rb clearance can act as an estimator of renal perfusion. The [99mTc]Tc-MAG3-to-82Rb clearance ratios suggest that the extraction fraction of 82Rb is higher than that of [99mTc]Tc-MAG3, further suggesting 82Rb clearance as an estimator of flow. However, further studies are warranted to validate use of 82Rb PET/CT for flow estimation.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信