Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic cystogastrostomy in very young children (aged <5 years): Feasibility, success, and safety

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70085
Ujjal Poddar, Arghya Samanta, Samir Mohindra, Vijay Datta Upadhyaya, Basant Kumar, Anshu Srivastava, Moinak Sen Sarma, Surender Kumar Yachha
{"title":"Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic cystogastrostomy in very young children (aged <5 years): Feasibility, success, and safety","authors":"Ujjal Poddar,&nbsp;Arghya Samanta,&nbsp;Samir Mohindra,&nbsp;Vijay Datta Upadhyaya,&nbsp;Basant Kumar,&nbsp;Anshu Srivastava,&nbsp;Moinak Sen Sarma,&nbsp;Surender Kumar Yachha","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Paucity of data and concerns about potential lower effectiveness and more adverse events limit the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic cystogastrostomy in younger children even in high-volume centers. We retrospectively analyzed indications, success rates, and adverse events of all the children (&lt;18 years) who underwent ERCP and endoscopic cystogastrostomy between January 2010 to May 2024 at our center.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data, including patient demographics, indications for the procedure, technical details, and adverse events, were collected from our prospectively kept database and compared according to age groups (&lt;1 year, 1–5 years, 5–10 years, and 10–18 years).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 286 ERCP (273 therapeutic and 13 diagnostic) and 57 endoscopic cystogastrostomy were performed in 222 (138 boys) and 55 children (32 boys), respectively, during the study period with 20% ERCP procedures in under-five children. In children &lt;5 years, the majority of the ERCPs were for biliary diseases (87%), while pancreatic duct procedures (39.5%) were done in higher numbers in children &gt;5 years. For biliary ERCP, choledochal cyst (15, 33%) was the most common etiology in under-five children and choledocholithiasis (60, 34%) in children &gt;5 years. Cannulation and technical success rates were 95% and 92%, respectively with no significant difference across age groups. Adverse events were noted in 36 (16%) with post-ERCP pancreatitis (8%) being the most common. All adverse events were managed conservatively with no mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ERCP can safely be performed in all children, including those under five with various hepato-pancreato-biliary diseases with high technical success rates.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Paucity of data and concerns about potential lower effectiveness and more adverse events limit the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic cystogastrostomy in younger children even in high-volume centers. We retrospectively analyzed indications, success rates, and adverse events of all the children (<18 years) who underwent ERCP and endoscopic cystogastrostomy between January 2010 to May 2024 at our center.

Methods

Data, including patient demographics, indications for the procedure, technical details, and adverse events, were collected from our prospectively kept database and compared according to age groups (<1 year, 1–5 years, 5–10 years, and 10–18 years).

Results

A total of 286 ERCP (273 therapeutic and 13 diagnostic) and 57 endoscopic cystogastrostomy were performed in 222 (138 boys) and 55 children (32 boys), respectively, during the study period with 20% ERCP procedures in under-five children. In children <5 years, the majority of the ERCPs were for biliary diseases (87%), while pancreatic duct procedures (39.5%) were done in higher numbers in children >5 years. For biliary ERCP, choledochal cyst (15, 33%) was the most common etiology in under-five children and choledocholithiasis (60, 34%) in children >5 years. Cannulation and technical success rates were 95% and 92%, respectively with no significant difference across age groups. Adverse events were noted in 36 (16%) with post-ERCP pancreatitis (8%) being the most common. All adverse events were managed conservatively with no mortality.

Conclusion

ERCP can safely be performed in all children, including those under five with various hepato-pancreato-biliary diseases with high technical success rates.

Abstract Image

目的 由于数据匮乏以及对潜在的较低有效性和较多不良事件的担忧,即使在高流量中心,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和内镜膀胱胃造瘘术在低龄儿童中的应用也受到限制。我们回顾性分析了本中心 2010 年 1 月至 2024 年 5 月期间接受 ERCP 和内镜下膀胱胃造瘘术的所有儿童(<18 岁)的适应症、成功率和不良事件。 方法 从我们的前瞻性数据库中收集包括患者人口统计学、手术适应症、技术细节和不良事件在内的数据,并按照年龄组(1 岁、1-5 岁、5-10 岁和 10-18 岁)进行比较。 结果 在研究期间,分别为 222 名儿童(138 名男孩)和 55 名儿童(32 名男孩)实施了 286 例 ERCP(273 例治疗性手术和 13 例诊断性手术)和 57 例内镜下膀胱胃造瘘术,其中五岁以下儿童接受 ERCP 手术的比例为 20%。在 5 岁以下儿童中,大多数 ERCP 是针对胆道疾病(87%),而胰管手术(39.5%)在 5 岁以下儿童中数量较多。就胆道ERCP而言,胆总管囊肿(15例,33%)是5岁以下儿童最常见的病因,而胆总管结石(60例,34%)则是5岁以下儿童最常见的病因。插管成功率和技术成功率分别为 95% 和 92%,各年龄组之间无明显差异。36人(16%)出现了不良反应,其中最常见的是ERCP术后胰腺炎(8%)。所有不良事件均得到保守治疗,无死亡病例。 结论 ERCP 可安全地用于所有儿童,包括患有各种肝胆胰疾病的五岁以下儿童,且技术成功率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信