Marie Crowe, Jenny Jordan, Richard Porter, Katie Douglas, Cameron Lacey, Bridgette Thwaites, Brendan Sillifant
{"title":"The Feasibility of Delivering Two Brief Psychotherapies for the Treatment of Depression in Primary Care","authors":"Marie Crowe, Jenny Jordan, Richard Porter, Katie Douglas, Cameron Lacey, Bridgette Thwaites, Brendan Sillifant","doi":"10.1002/capr.12906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of delivering two psychotherapies for primary care patients with depression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients were referred for psychotherapy from primary care services and were randomly assigned to either Intensive Activation Therapy (IAT; behavioural activation therapy plus cognitive remediation) or Patient-directed Psychoeducation (PDP; a novel psychotherapy based on the diathesis-stress model). The interventions were delivered over 10–12 sessions (IAT) and five sessions (PDP). Feasibility was evaluated by recruitment numbers, patient interviews, ability to deliver an adequate dose, managing risk in a non-medical setting, training new therapists and ensuring treatment fidelity. Mood and functioning were measured at baseline and 12 weeks. Qualitative interviews were conducted at 12 weeks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>It was feasible to deliver both therapies to primary care patients with severe depression at baseline. Both therapies were effective, with no difference in improving mood and functioning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This feasibility study suggests that both IAT and PDP can be feasibly delivered in primary care and could be effective in treating severe depression. The next phase will involve training primary care clinicians to deliver the interventions within routine practice and a further study of the effectiveness of the two therapies in routine clinical care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12906","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of delivering two psychotherapies for primary care patients with depression.
Methods
Patients were referred for psychotherapy from primary care services and were randomly assigned to either Intensive Activation Therapy (IAT; behavioural activation therapy plus cognitive remediation) or Patient-directed Psychoeducation (PDP; a novel psychotherapy based on the diathesis-stress model). The interventions were delivered over 10–12 sessions (IAT) and five sessions (PDP). Feasibility was evaluated by recruitment numbers, patient interviews, ability to deliver an adequate dose, managing risk in a non-medical setting, training new therapists and ensuring treatment fidelity. Mood and functioning were measured at baseline and 12 weeks. Qualitative interviews were conducted at 12 weeks.
Results
It was feasible to deliver both therapies to primary care patients with severe depression at baseline. Both therapies were effective, with no difference in improving mood and functioning.
Conclusions
This feasibility study suggests that both IAT and PDP can be feasibly delivered in primary care and could be effective in treating severe depression. The next phase will involve training primary care clinicians to deliver the interventions within routine practice and a further study of the effectiveness of the two therapies in routine clinical care.
期刊介绍:
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.