Greener solvents for microelution solid phase extraction of proteins from biological fluids followed by their top-down CE-MS analysis

IF 6.5 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Martina Opetová , Radovan Tomašovský , Katarína Maráková
{"title":"Greener solvents for microelution solid phase extraction of proteins from biological fluids followed by their top-down CE-MS analysis","authors":"Martina Opetová ,&nbsp;Radovan Tomašovský ,&nbsp;Katarína Maráková","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, there has been a growing demand for making the analytical processes sustainable and environmentally friendly. In proteomic analysis, sample preparation plays an important role, employing different extraction techniques to isolate proteins of interest from biological fluids to be able to analyze them. These techniques usually use large volumes of organic solvents, such as acetonitrile, which has been recognized as hazardous and difficult to dispense. According to green analytical chemistry principles, the environmental impact of the methods can be reduced either by miniaturizing the processes or by replacing organic solvents with less toxic alternatives. This work compares the effect of different greener solvents on the solid-phase extraction process of low molecular weight proteins spiked in biological fluids (pooled human serum, plasma, urine, and saliva) and suggests that ethanol (60 %, v/v) offers, when used as an elution solvent, comparable results to acetonitrile (75 % v/v) in terms of extraction recovery. The addition of acidic modifiers to the elution solvent did not improve the extraction recovery, and the nitrogen evaporation of the eluate resulted in a 17–53 % loss of the proteins compared to the simple dilution of the eluate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing demand for making the analytical processes sustainable and environmentally friendly. In proteomic analysis, sample preparation plays an important role, employing different extraction techniques to isolate proteins of interest from biological fluids to be able to analyze them. These techniques usually use large volumes of organic solvents, such as acetonitrile, which has been recognized as hazardous and difficult to dispense. According to green analytical chemistry principles, the environmental impact of the methods can be reduced either by miniaturizing the processes or by replacing organic solvents with less toxic alternatives. This work compares the effect of different greener solvents on the solid-phase extraction process of low molecular weight proteins spiked in biological fluids (pooled human serum, plasma, urine, and saliva) and suggests that ethanol (60 %, v/v) offers, when used as an elution solvent, comparable results to acetonitrile (75 % v/v) in terms of extraction recovery. The addition of acidic modifiers to the elution solvent did not improve the extraction recovery, and the nitrogen evaporation of the eluate resulted in a 17–53 % loss of the proteins compared to the simple dilution of the eluate.

Abstract Image

更环保的微洗脱溶剂,固相萃取生物液中的蛋白质,然后进行自上而下的CE-MS分析
近年来,越来越多的人要求使分析过程具有可持续性和环境友好性。在蛋白质组学分析中,样品制备起着重要的作用,采用不同的提取技术从生物流体中分离出感兴趣的蛋白质,以便能够分析它们。这些技术通常使用大量的有机溶剂,如乙腈,这是公认的危险和难以分配。根据绿色分析化学原理,这些方法对环境的影响可以通过将过程小型化或用毒性较小的替代品取代有机溶剂来减少。本研究比较了不同绿色溶剂对生物液体(混合的人血清、血浆、尿液和唾液)中低分子量蛋白质固相萃取过程的影响,并表明乙醇(60%,v/v)作为洗脱溶剂时,提取回收率与乙腈(75% v/v)相当。在洗脱溶剂中加入酸性改性剂并没有提高萃取回收率,与简单稀释洗脱液相比,洗脱液的氮蒸发导致蛋白质损失17 - 53%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信