Greener solvents for microelution solid phase extraction of proteins from biological fluids followed by their top-down CE-MS analysis

IF 5.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Martina Opetová , Radovan Tomašovský , Katarína Maráková
{"title":"Greener solvents for microelution solid phase extraction of proteins from biological fluids followed by their top-down CE-MS analysis","authors":"Martina Opetová ,&nbsp;Radovan Tomašovský ,&nbsp;Katarína Maráková","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, there has been a growing demand for making the analytical processes sustainable and environmentally friendly. In proteomic analysis, sample preparation plays an important role, employing different extraction techniques to isolate proteins of interest from biological fluids to be able to analyze them. These techniques usually use large volumes of organic solvents, such as acetonitrile, which has been recognized as hazardous and difficult to dispense. According to green analytical chemistry principles, the environmental impact of the methods can be reduced either by miniaturizing the processes or by replacing organic solvents with less toxic alternatives. This work compares the effect of different greener solvents on the solid-phase extraction process of low molecular weight proteins spiked in biological fluids (pooled human serum, plasma, urine, and saliva) and suggests that ethanol (60 %, v/v) offers, when used as an elution solvent, comparable results to acetonitrile (75 % v/v) in terms of extraction recovery. The addition of acidic modifiers to the elution solvent did not improve the extraction recovery, and the nitrogen evaporation of the eluate resulted in a 17–53 % loss of the proteins compared to the simple dilution of the eluate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100160"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing demand for making the analytical processes sustainable and environmentally friendly. In proteomic analysis, sample preparation plays an important role, employing different extraction techniques to isolate proteins of interest from biological fluids to be able to analyze them. These techniques usually use large volumes of organic solvents, such as acetonitrile, which has been recognized as hazardous and difficult to dispense. According to green analytical chemistry principles, the environmental impact of the methods can be reduced either by miniaturizing the processes or by replacing organic solvents with less toxic alternatives. This work compares the effect of different greener solvents on the solid-phase extraction process of low molecular weight proteins spiked in biological fluids (pooled human serum, plasma, urine, and saliva) and suggests that ethanol (60 %, v/v) offers, when used as an elution solvent, comparable results to acetonitrile (75 % v/v) in terms of extraction recovery. The addition of acidic modifiers to the elution solvent did not improve the extraction recovery, and the nitrogen evaporation of the eluate resulted in a 17–53 % loss of the proteins compared to the simple dilution of the eluate.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信