Compressive failure mechanisms of fibre metal laminates with 2/1 and 3/2 configurations after low-velocity impact

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Zheng-Qiang Cheng , Jie Xia , Hu Liu , Zhi-Wu Zhu , Wei Tan
{"title":"Compressive failure mechanisms of fibre metal laminates with 2/1 and 3/2 configurations after low-velocity impact","authors":"Zheng-Qiang Cheng ,&nbsp;Jie Xia ,&nbsp;Hu Liu ,&nbsp;Zhi-Wu Zhu ,&nbsp;Wei Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2025.113112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The residual compressive strength after low-velocity impact (LVI) serves as a pivotal metric for assessing the damage tolerance of composite structures. This paper aims to elucidate the compressive failure mechanisms of glass fibre/aluminium fibre metal laminates (FMLs) that have incurred initial LVI damage, meanwhile illustrating the effects of fibre orientation, impact energy and laminate configuration on the compressive failure behaviours of FMLs. Initially, specific impact damage was prefabricated and examined in FMLs with 2/1 and 3/2 configurations. Quasi-static compression tests were then conducted to analyse the global force versus displacement responses and local strain evolution of FMLs during compressive loading. Furthermore, visual inspection, ultrasonic C-scan, and CT-scan were employed to explain the damage morphologies and failure mechanisms of FMLs. Finally, the comparative analysis of the compression after impact (CAI) strengths was conducted for different FMLs. The results demonstrate that fibre orientation, impact energy and laminate configuration significantly affect the compressive mechanical responses and damage morphologies of FMLs. Moreover, FMLs experience a 40–61 % decrease in compressive strength after LVI within the energy range from 35 J to 65 J. Additionally, the 3/2 configuration is a more advantageous laminate design than the 2/1 configuration in terms of specific CAI strength and residual strength ratio. This research contributes novel insights into the impact damage tolerance of FMLs, which hold promise as load-bearing structural materials in aeronautic applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 113112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026382312500206X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The residual compressive strength after low-velocity impact (LVI) serves as a pivotal metric for assessing the damage tolerance of composite structures. This paper aims to elucidate the compressive failure mechanisms of glass fibre/aluminium fibre metal laminates (FMLs) that have incurred initial LVI damage, meanwhile illustrating the effects of fibre orientation, impact energy and laminate configuration on the compressive failure behaviours of FMLs. Initially, specific impact damage was prefabricated and examined in FMLs with 2/1 and 3/2 configurations. Quasi-static compression tests were then conducted to analyse the global force versus displacement responses and local strain evolution of FMLs during compressive loading. Furthermore, visual inspection, ultrasonic C-scan, and CT-scan were employed to explain the damage morphologies and failure mechanisms of FMLs. Finally, the comparative analysis of the compression after impact (CAI) strengths was conducted for different FMLs. The results demonstrate that fibre orientation, impact energy and laminate configuration significantly affect the compressive mechanical responses and damage morphologies of FMLs. Moreover, FMLs experience a 40–61 % decrease in compressive strength after LVI within the energy range from 35 J to 65 J. Additionally, the 3/2 configuration is a more advantageous laminate design than the 2/1 configuration in terms of specific CAI strength and residual strength ratio. This research contributes novel insights into the impact damage tolerance of FMLs, which hold promise as load-bearing structural materials in aeronautic applications.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信