Navigating Barriers and Building Bridges: A Qualitative Exploration of the Leadership Journeys of Black Occupational Therapists.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Tyra M Banks, Karen Park, Kayla Gibson
{"title":"Navigating Barriers and Building Bridges: A Qualitative Exploration of the Leadership Journeys of Black Occupational Therapists.","authors":"Tyra M Banks, Karen Park, Kayla Gibson","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.050988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>This article illuminates the unique challenges Black occupational therapy practitioners face on their leadership paths. Amplifying minoritized voices and raising awareness of systemic racism serve as catalysts for fostering equity and inclusivity in the occupational therapy profession.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the journey and lived experience of Black occupational therapy practitioners currently holding or who had previously held leadership positions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interpretive phenomenological method was used to explore, identify, and analyze the supports and barriers participants encountered while pursuing leadership roles. Participants completed a demographic survey and a 60-min virtual interview. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes, and theory triangulation ensured validity and rigor in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Five themes emerged: (1) sociocultural context can nurture the potential for leadership, (2) responsibility to build a legacy of representation, (3) micro- and macroaggressions: stereotyped and underestimated, (4) networking as a necessary process, and (5) creating inclusive spaces expands professional identities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Findings were examined and triangulated through the lens of critical race theory and social network theory, providing valuable context for understanding social structures, power dynamics, and their impact on developing Black occupational therapy practitioner leaders. The data support the importance of networks and the role of institutional racism in perpetuating social inequalities that persist in the leadership journey of Black occupational therapy practitioners. Plain-Language Summary: This manuscript illuminates the unique challenges Black occupational therapy practitioners face in their leadership paths. Researchers used an interpretive phenomenological research design to explore the journeys and lived experiences of seven Black occupational therapy practitioners currently holding or who had previously held leadership positions within the past 5 yr. Five themes emerged: (1) sociocultural context can nurture the potential for leadership, (2) responsibility to build a legacy of representation, (3) micro- and macroaggressions: stereotyped and underestimated, (4) networking as a necessary process, and (5) creating inclusive spaces expands professional identities. The findings were examined and triangulated through the lens of critical race theory and social network theory, providing context for understanding social structures, power dynamics, and the impact of these structures on developing Black occupational therapy practitioner leaders. The data support the importance of networks and the role of institutional racism in maintaining the social inequalities persisting on the leadership journey of Black occupational therapy practitioners. Positionality Statement: The authors all identify as cis women of color and advocate for the impact of the intersection of race and gender on the occupational therapy profession. Tyra M. Banks is a Black woman, educator, scholar, and first-generation college educated. Karen Park is a Korean American, neurodivergent woman, occupational therapist, educator, scholar, and child of immigrants. Kayla Gibson is a Black woman, athlete, occupational therapist, and first-generation college educated. Their combined identities and lived experiences in a predominantly White profession allow them to hold an intersectional lens for critically analyzing the profession and amplifying voices historically excluded from occupational therapy narratives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: This article illuminates the unique challenges Black occupational therapy practitioners face on their leadership paths. Amplifying minoritized voices and raising awareness of systemic racism serve as catalysts for fostering equity and inclusivity in the occupational therapy profession.

Objective: To explore the journey and lived experience of Black occupational therapy practitioners currently holding or who had previously held leadership positions.

Methods: An interpretive phenomenological method was used to explore, identify, and analyze the supports and barriers participants encountered while pursuing leadership roles. Participants completed a demographic survey and a 60-min virtual interview. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify themes, and theory triangulation ensured validity and rigor in the analysis.

Findings: Five themes emerged: (1) sociocultural context can nurture the potential for leadership, (2) responsibility to build a legacy of representation, (3) micro- and macroaggressions: stereotyped and underestimated, (4) networking as a necessary process, and (5) creating inclusive spaces expands professional identities.

Conclusions and relevance: Findings were examined and triangulated through the lens of critical race theory and social network theory, providing valuable context for understanding social structures, power dynamics, and their impact on developing Black occupational therapy practitioner leaders. The data support the importance of networks and the role of institutional racism in perpetuating social inequalities that persist in the leadership journey of Black occupational therapy practitioners. Plain-Language Summary: This manuscript illuminates the unique challenges Black occupational therapy practitioners face in their leadership paths. Researchers used an interpretive phenomenological research design to explore the journeys and lived experiences of seven Black occupational therapy practitioners currently holding or who had previously held leadership positions within the past 5 yr. Five themes emerged: (1) sociocultural context can nurture the potential for leadership, (2) responsibility to build a legacy of representation, (3) micro- and macroaggressions: stereotyped and underestimated, (4) networking as a necessary process, and (5) creating inclusive spaces expands professional identities. The findings were examined and triangulated through the lens of critical race theory and social network theory, providing context for understanding social structures, power dynamics, and the impact of these structures on developing Black occupational therapy practitioner leaders. The data support the importance of networks and the role of institutional racism in maintaining the social inequalities persisting on the leadership journey of Black occupational therapy practitioners. Positionality Statement: The authors all identify as cis women of color and advocate for the impact of the intersection of race and gender on the occupational therapy profession. Tyra M. Banks is a Black woman, educator, scholar, and first-generation college educated. Karen Park is a Korean American, neurodivergent woman, occupational therapist, educator, scholar, and child of immigrants. Kayla Gibson is a Black woman, athlete, occupational therapist, and first-generation college educated. Their combined identities and lived experiences in a predominantly White profession allow them to hold an intersectional lens for critically analyzing the profession and amplifying voices historically excluded from occupational therapy narratives.

跨越障碍和建立桥梁:黑人职业治疗师领导旅程的定性探索。
重要性:本文阐明了黑人职业治疗从业者在领导道路上面临的独特挑战。放大少数群体的声音和提高对系统性种族主义的认识是促进职业治疗行业公平和包容性的催化剂:探索目前担任或曾经担任领导职务的黑人职业治疗从业者的心路历程和生活经历:方法: 采用解释现象学方法探索、识别和分析参与者在担任领导职务时遇到的支持和障碍。参与者完成了一项人口调查和一次 60 分钟的虚拟访谈。反思性主题分析用于确定主题,理论三角验证确保了分析的有效性和严谨性:出现了五个主题:(1) 社会文化背景可以培养领导力的潜力,(2) 建立代表性遗产的责任,(3) 微观和宏观侵害:陈规定型和被低估,(4) 网络是一个必要的过程,(5) 创建包容性空间扩展专业身份:通过批判性种族理论和社会网络理论的视角对研究结果进行了检验和三角测量,为理解社会结构、权力动态及其对黑人职业治疗从业人员领导力发展的影响提供了宝贵的背景资料。数据支持了网络的重要性以及制度性种族主义在延续社会不平等方面的作用,这些不平等在黑人职业治疗从业者的领导力发展历程中持续存在。通俗摘要:本手稿揭示了黑人职业治疗从业者在领导道路上面临的独特挑战。研究人员采用解释性现象学研究设计,探讨了七位目前担任或曾在过去五年内担任领导职务的黑人职业治疗从业者的心路历程和生活经历。研究中出现了五个主题:(1)社会文化背景可以培养领导潜力;(2)建立代表遗产的责任;(3)微观和宏观侵害:刻板印象和低估;(4)网络是一个必要的过程;(5)创造包容性空间扩展职业身份。研究结果通过批判种族理论和社会网络理论的视角进行了检验和三角测量,为理解社会结构、权力动态以及这些结构对培养黑人职业治疗从业领导者的影响提供了背景。数据支持了网络的重要性,以及制度性种族主义在维持黑人职业治疗从业者领导力历程中持续存在的社会不平等方面所扮演的角色。立场声明:作者均为有色人种女性,主张种族与性别的交叉对职业治疗专业的影响。泰拉-班克斯(Tyra M. Banks)是一名黑人女性、教育家、学者和第一代大学毕业生。卡伦-帕克(Karen Park)是一名韩裔美国人、神经变异女性、职业治疗师、教育家、学者和移民子女。凯拉-吉布森(Kayla Gibson)是一名黑人女性、运动员、职业治疗师、第一代大学毕业生。在以白人为主的职业中,她们的综合身份和生活经历使她们能够以交叉视角对职业进行批判性分析,并放大历来被排除在职业治疗叙述之外的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信