Performance of 30 protocol combinations for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in stool samples.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Eloïse Bailly, Chloé Baranton, Stéphane Valot, Anne Vincent, Hervé Begue, Corentin Beclere, Alain Bonnin, Damien Costa, Philippe Poirier, Louise Basmaciyan, Frédéric Dalle
{"title":"Performance of 30 protocol combinations for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in stool samples.","authors":"Eloïse Bailly, Chloé Baranton, Stéphane Valot, Anne Vincent, Hervé Begue, Corentin Beclere, Alain Bonnin, Damien Costa, Philippe Poirier, Louise Basmaciyan, Frédéric Dalle","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal parasitic diseases affect millions of people worldwide. Numerous commercial molecular methods detecting digestive parasites have been developed recently, including multiplex PCR assays able to identify multiple parasites at once. Several studies have demonstrated that the efficacy of these molecular methods is dependent on the specific protocols employed at each stage of the process including pretreatment, extraction and amplification. However, previous studies have exclusively focused on one of these steps, without considering the others. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performances of molecular tools for Cryptosporidium parvum detection in stool samples, considering all steps of the process simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>30 distinct combinations of protocols were evaluated corresponding to three pre-treatment methods, four DNA extraction techniques and six DNA amplification assays. The performances of these combinations were evaluated in terms of detection limit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We showed that different combinations yielded varying results. The FTD® Stool Parasite technique proved to be the most effective, achieving 100 % detection. Manual extraction methods demonstrated excellent outcomes, although they are time-consuming. The optimal approach for detecting C. parvum DNA is a combination of mechanical pretreatment, the Nuclisens® Easymag® extraction method, and the FTD® Stool Parasite DNA amplification method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work shows that the molecular diagnosis should consider all stages. A PCR method may not be effective with an unsuitable extraction technique, but can yield optimal results with an appropriate one.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2025.01.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intestinal parasitic diseases affect millions of people worldwide. Numerous commercial molecular methods detecting digestive parasites have been developed recently, including multiplex PCR assays able to identify multiple parasites at once. Several studies have demonstrated that the efficacy of these molecular methods is dependent on the specific protocols employed at each stage of the process including pretreatment, extraction and amplification. However, previous studies have exclusively focused on one of these steps, without considering the others. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performances of molecular tools for Cryptosporidium parvum detection in stool samples, considering all steps of the process simultaneously.

Methods: 30 distinct combinations of protocols were evaluated corresponding to three pre-treatment methods, four DNA extraction techniques and six DNA amplification assays. The performances of these combinations were evaluated in terms of detection limit.

Results: We showed that different combinations yielded varying results. The FTD® Stool Parasite technique proved to be the most effective, achieving 100 % detection. Manual extraction methods demonstrated excellent outcomes, although they are time-consuming. The optimal approach for detecting C. parvum DNA is a combination of mechanical pretreatment, the Nuclisens® Easymag® extraction method, and the FTD® Stool Parasite DNA amplification method.

Conclusion: This work shows that the molecular diagnosis should consider all stages. A PCR method may not be effective with an unsuitable extraction technique, but can yield optimal results with an appropriate one.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信