Ganga hospital open injury severity score as a predictor of early failure of limb salvage among gustilo type III A and B tibia fractures in Uganda: a prospective cohort study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Maxwel Dancan Okuku, Umaru Kabuye, Stephen Angira Khadolwa, Abubakar Mohamed Aweis, Okedi Francis Xaviour, Demoz Abraha, Charles Quealee, Anthony Ayotunde Olasinde, Ibe Michael Usman
{"title":"Ganga hospital open injury severity score as a predictor of early failure of limb salvage among gustilo type III A and B tibia fractures in Uganda: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Maxwel Dancan Okuku, Umaru Kabuye, Stephen Angira Khadolwa, Abubakar Mohamed Aweis, Okedi Francis Xaviour, Demoz Abraha, Charles Quealee, Anthony Ayotunde Olasinde, Ibe Michael Usman","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02811-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advances in antibiotic therapy and microsurgery, the management of Gustilo and Anderson type IIIA and B open tibia fractures continues to pose a considerable challenge in developing countries. This has evolved from historical immediate amputation to modern approaches that prioritize both aesthetics and functional outcomes. Nonetheless, a consensus on limb salvage versus amputation remains elusive, prompting the development of prognostic limb scoring systems. Our study assessed the predictive accuracy of the Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score (GHOISS) for early failure of limb salvage in Gustilo type IIIA and B tibia injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study that examined open tibia fractures at two tertiary hospitals in the emergency and orthopaedic units between June and October 2023. Fifty-three (26 IIIB and 27 IIIA) satisfied the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four injuries (type IIIA) in paediatric patients that had met the inclusion criteria were excluded from analysis to ensure homogeneity and generalizability of the results due to their small numbers. The severity of injury for each Gustilo type III A and B tibia fracture was determined using the GHOISS, and limb salvage decisions were made irrespective of the GHOISS. Follow-up was extended for up to fourteen days to assess the necessity of secondary amputation in salvaged limbs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 49 Gustilo type IIIA and B tibia fractures, 43 were successfully salvaged, while 6 necessitated amputation (4 primary, 2 secondary). A GHOISS of 13 demonstrated maximum specificity (90.7%) and sensitivity (83.3%) in predicting amputation, with an AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.804-0.977), indicating strong discriminatory accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GHOISS reliably predicted outcomes in patients with Gustilo type IIIA and B tibia fractures, with a score of 13 demonstrating optimal sensitivity and specificity above which early failure of limb salvage is anticipated.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02811-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite advances in antibiotic therapy and microsurgery, the management of Gustilo and Anderson type IIIA and B open tibia fractures continues to pose a considerable challenge in developing countries. This has evolved from historical immediate amputation to modern approaches that prioritize both aesthetics and functional outcomes. Nonetheless, a consensus on limb salvage versus amputation remains elusive, prompting the development of prognostic limb scoring systems. Our study assessed the predictive accuracy of the Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score (GHOISS) for early failure of limb salvage in Gustilo type IIIA and B tibia injuries.

Methods: This was a prospective study that examined open tibia fractures at two tertiary hospitals in the emergency and orthopaedic units between June and October 2023. Fifty-three (26 IIIB and 27 IIIA) satisfied the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four injuries (type IIIA) in paediatric patients that had met the inclusion criteria were excluded from analysis to ensure homogeneity and generalizability of the results due to their small numbers. The severity of injury for each Gustilo type III A and B tibia fracture was determined using the GHOISS, and limb salvage decisions were made irrespective of the GHOISS. Follow-up was extended for up to fourteen days to assess the necessity of secondary amputation in salvaged limbs.

Results: Among 49 Gustilo type IIIA and B tibia fractures, 43 were successfully salvaged, while 6 necessitated amputation (4 primary, 2 secondary). A GHOISS of 13 demonstrated maximum specificity (90.7%) and sensitivity (83.3%) in predicting amputation, with an AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.804-0.977), indicating strong discriminatory accuracy.

Conclusion: The GHOISS reliably predicted outcomes in patients with Gustilo type IIIA and B tibia fractures, with a score of 13 demonstrating optimal sensitivity and specificity above which early failure of limb salvage is anticipated.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信