Phase one of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study to assess the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of implementing seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula Province, Mozambique.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kevin Baker, Ivan Alejandro Pulido Tarquino, Pedro Aide, Craig Bonnington, Christian Rassi, Sol Richardson, Chuks Nnaji, Arantxa Roca-Feltrer, Maria Rodrigues, Mercia Sitoe, Sonia Enosse, Caitlin McGugan, Francisco Saute, Gloria Matambisso, Baltazar Candrinho
{"title":"Phase one of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study to assess the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of implementing seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula Province, Mozambique.","authors":"Kevin Baker, Ivan Alejandro Pulido Tarquino, Pedro Aide, Craig Bonnington, Christian Rassi, Sol Richardson, Chuks Nnaji, Arantxa Roca-Feltrer, Maria Rodrigues, Mercia Sitoe, Sonia Enosse, Caitlin McGugan, Francisco Saute, Gloria Matambisso, Baltazar Candrinho","doi":"10.1186/s12936-024-05229-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is a highly effective intervention for malaria prevention in high burden areas with seasonal transmission, historically implemented in the Sahel. Mozambique contributes to 4% of global malaria cases. Malaria Consortium, in partnership with the National Malaria Control Programme, conducted a two-year phased SMC study in Nampula province using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus amodiaquine (AQ), or SPAQ, in children under five. Phase one results presented here highlight acceptability, feasibility, and protective effect of SMC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design was adopted, using mixed methods. The study was conducted in three districts, utilizing: (1) non-randomized controlled trial reporting on malaria incidence; (2) drug resistance molecular marker study reporting on resistance marker changes over time; (3) coverage and quality assessment on the SMC distribution; and (4) a qualitative acceptability and feasibility assessment with stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children who received SMC had 86% (hazard ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.24) lower hazards of developing clinical malaria during the peak transmission season compared with children in the comparison district. Prevalence of SP molecular markers associated with resistance was high at baseline (K540E 66.1%). SMC achieved high coverage of eligible children over four cycles (87.7%, 95% CI 83.9-90.8%). Qualitative results indicate SMC was positively accepted by the targeted community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that SMC was effective at preventing clinical malaria, did not significantly impact resistance profile, and was feasible and acceptable in the context. Phase two will assess SMC impact in reducing malaria incidence and if chemoprevention efficacy of SPAQ is impacted by drug resistance and drug concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-05229-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) is a highly effective intervention for malaria prevention in high burden areas with seasonal transmission, historically implemented in the Sahel. Mozambique contributes to 4% of global malaria cases. Malaria Consortium, in partnership with the National Malaria Control Programme, conducted a two-year phased SMC study in Nampula province using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus amodiaquine (AQ), or SPAQ, in children under five. Phase one results presented here highlight acceptability, feasibility, and protective effect of SMC.

Methods: A pragmatic type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design was adopted, using mixed methods. The study was conducted in three districts, utilizing: (1) non-randomized controlled trial reporting on malaria incidence; (2) drug resistance molecular marker study reporting on resistance marker changes over time; (3) coverage and quality assessment on the SMC distribution; and (4) a qualitative acceptability and feasibility assessment with stakeholders.

Results: Children who received SMC had 86% (hazard ratio 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.24) lower hazards of developing clinical malaria during the peak transmission season compared with children in the comparison district. Prevalence of SP molecular markers associated with resistance was high at baseline (K540E 66.1%). SMC achieved high coverage of eligible children over four cycles (87.7%, 95% CI 83.9-90.8%). Qualitative results indicate SMC was positively accepted by the targeted community.

Conclusions: Results suggest that SMC was effective at preventing clinical malaria, did not significantly impact resistance profile, and was feasible and acceptable in the context. Phase two will assess SMC impact in reducing malaria incidence and if chemoprevention efficacy of SPAQ is impacted by drug resistance and drug concentrations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信