{"title":"Depth of response in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy: A supplementary analysis of JCOG1407","authors":"Taro Shibuki , Masafumi Ikeda , Masayuki Yokoyama , Yusuke Sano , Junji Furuse , Satoshi Kobayashi , Akihiro Ohba , Akiko Todaka , Yoshiki Horie , Kazuhiko Shioji , Masashi Kanai , Tomohiro Nishina , Yusuke Kumamoto , Nao Fujimori , Akio Katanuma , Yukiko Takayama , Hidetaka Tsumura , Haruo Miwa , Masato Ozaka , Makoto Ueno","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>Depth of response (DpR; maximum % reduction from baseline in sum of the target lesion diameters) has demonstrated potential in predicting prognosis in several malignancies. However, its role in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still unclear. In JCOG1407, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) exhibited comparable efficacy for LAPC. In this exploratory analysis using the data of JCOG1407, we focused on the association between DpR and prognosis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>DpR was classified into three groups at the tertile point and patients’ backgrounds and survival were compared. The impact of DpR on survival outcomes was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 109 patients were included, categorized into three DpR groups: T1 (<−37.2 %), T2 (−37.2 to −13.6 %), and T3 (>−13.6 %). The median DpR was significantly greater in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm (−28.9 vs. −22.7 %, P = 0.041). Median duration of response tended to be shorter in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm, although the difference was not significant (5.3 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.132). Greater DpR (T1) had a significantly larger impact on better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than T3, with the hazard ratio of 0.469 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.268–0.821, P = 0.008), and 0.398 (95 % CI 0.217–0.728, P = 0.003), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>mFOLFIRINOX and GnP had similar OS, it is noteworthy that the regimens exhibited differences in DpR, with GnP leading to greater DpR. Greater DpR are associated with improved survival in patients with LAPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 275-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S142439032500033X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives
Depth of response (DpR; maximum % reduction from baseline in sum of the target lesion diameters) has demonstrated potential in predicting prognosis in several malignancies. However, its role in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still unclear. In JCOG1407, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) exhibited comparable efficacy for LAPC. In this exploratory analysis using the data of JCOG1407, we focused on the association between DpR and prognosis.
Methods
DpR was classified into three groups at the tertile point and patients’ backgrounds and survival were compared. The impact of DpR on survival outcomes was evaluated using the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.
Results
Of the 126 patients enrolled in JCOG1407, 109 patients were included, categorized into three DpR groups: T1 (<−37.2 %), T2 (−37.2 to −13.6 %), and T3 (>−13.6 %). The median DpR was significantly greater in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm (−28.9 vs. −22.7 %, P = 0.041). Median duration of response tended to be shorter in the GnP arm than in the mFOLFIRINOX arm, although the difference was not significant (5.3 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.132). Greater DpR (T1) had a significantly larger impact on better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than T3, with the hazard ratio of 0.469 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.268–0.821, P = 0.008), and 0.398 (95 % CI 0.217–0.728, P = 0.003), respectively.
Conclusions
mFOLFIRINOX and GnP had similar OS, it is noteworthy that the regimens exhibited differences in DpR, with GnP leading to greater DpR. Greater DpR are associated with improved survival in patients with LAPC.
背景/目标:深度响应(DpR;从基线到目标病变直径总和的最大缩小%已被证明在预测几种恶性肿瘤的预后方面具有潜力。然而,其在局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)中的作用尚不清楚。在JCOG1407中,改良的FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX)和吉西他滨加nab-紫杉醇(GnP)对LAPC的疗效相当。在这项使用JCOG1407数据的探索性分析中,我们重点研究了DpR与预后之间的关系。方法:将DpR分为三组,并比较患者的背景和生存情况。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估DpR对生存结果的影响。结果:在JCOG1407纳入的126例患者中,109例患者被纳入,分为3个DpR组:T1(- 13.6%)。GnP组的中位DpR显著高于mFOLFIRINOX组(-28.9 vs - 22.7%, P = 0.041)。虽然差异不显著(5.3个月对8.2个月,P = 0.132),但GnP组的中位反应持续时间往往短于mFOLFIRINOX组。大DpR (T1)对更好的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响显著大于T3,风险比分别为0.469(95%可信区间[CI] 0.268-0.821, P = 0.008)和0.398 (95% CI 0.217-0.728, P = 0.003)。结论:mFOLFIRINOX和GnP具有相似的OS,值得注意的是,两种方案在DpR方面存在差异,GnP导致更大的DpR。更大的DpR与LAPC患者的生存率提高相关。
期刊介绍:
Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.