Independent Prognostic Significance of Myocardial Flow Reserve over Coronary Artery Calcium, Myocardial Perfusion, and Clinical Variables in Patients without Known CAD, according to Diabetes Status.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Su Nam Lee, Pankaj Malhotra, Robert J H Miller, Heidi Gransar, Sean W Hayes, John D Friedman, Louise E J Thomson, Alan Rozanski, Piotr J Slomka, Donghee Han, Daniel S Berman
{"title":"Independent Prognostic Significance of Myocardial Flow Reserve over Coronary Artery Calcium, Myocardial Perfusion, and Clinical Variables in Patients without Known CAD, according to Diabetes Status.","authors":"Su Nam Lee, Pankaj Malhotra, Robert J H Miller, Heidi Gransar, Sean W Hayes, John D Friedman, Louise E J Thomson, Alan Rozanski, Piotr J Slomka, Donghee Han, Daniel S Berman","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore differences in prevalence and prognosis associated with reduced myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) based on diabetes status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 2,639 patients without known CAD who underwent rubidium positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), 818 patients (31%) had diabetes. Reduced MFR was defined as MFR <2.0. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) score was categorized as 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥ 400. Ischemic total perfusion deficit (TPD) was categorized as <1%, 1-<5%, and ≥ 5%. Outcome variables were all-cause death (ACD) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During median follow-up of 4.1 year, 574 (21.8%) ACD/MI occurred (204 [25.1%] diabetic patients, 370 [20.3%] non-diabetic patients). In multivariable Cox analysis, reduced MFR was associated with increased ACD/MI in patients with diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001) and patients without diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, P < 0.001). No interaction existed between diabetes and MFR for ACD/MI risk regardless of CAC or ischemic burden (all p > 0.05). Adding MFR to the risk prediction model of clinical, conventional MPI findings, and CAC improved the discrimination for clinical outcomes in both groups (DM: 0.003, non-DM: <0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reduced MFR was more common in patients with diabetes and an important independent prognostic marker over CAC and clinical variables. The association between MFR and ACD/MI risk did not differ between patients with and without diabetes who had no prior CAD, regardless of CAC and ischemic burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":16476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"102165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2025.102165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore differences in prevalence and prognosis associated with reduced myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) based on diabetes status.

Methods: Of 2,639 patients without known CAD who underwent rubidium positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), 818 patients (31%) had diabetes. Reduced MFR was defined as MFR <2.0. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) score was categorized as 0, 1-99, 100-399, and ≥ 400. Ischemic total perfusion deficit (TPD) was categorized as <1%, 1-<5%, and ≥ 5%. Outcome variables were all-cause death (ACD) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI).

Results: During median follow-up of 4.1 year, 574 (21.8%) ACD/MI occurred (204 [25.1%] diabetic patients, 370 [20.3%] non-diabetic patients). In multivariable Cox analysis, reduced MFR was associated with increased ACD/MI in patients with diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001) and patients without diabetes (per 0.1 decrease: HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, P < 0.001). No interaction existed between diabetes and MFR for ACD/MI risk regardless of CAC or ischemic burden (all p > 0.05). Adding MFR to the risk prediction model of clinical, conventional MPI findings, and CAC improved the discrimination for clinical outcomes in both groups (DM: 0.003, non-DM: <0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Reduced MFR was more common in patients with diabetes and an important independent prognostic marker over CAC and clinical variables. The association between MFR and ACD/MI risk did not differ between patients with and without diabetes who had no prior CAD, regardless of CAC and ischemic burden.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.80%
发文量
249
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology is the only journal in the world devoted to this dynamic and growing subspecialty. Physicians and technologists value the Journal not only for its peer-reviewed articles, but also for its timely discussions about the current and future role of nuclear cardiology. Original articles address all aspects of nuclear cardiology, including interpretation, diagnosis, imaging equipment, and use of radiopharmaceuticals. As the official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Journal also brings readers the latest information emerging from the Society''s task forces and publishes guidelines and position papers as they are adopted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信