Yasuhiro Kotera, Riddhi Daryanani, Oliver Skipper, Jonathan Simpson, Simran Takhi, Merly McPhilbin, Benjamin-Rose Ingall, Mariam Namasaba, Jessica Jepps, Vanessa Kellermann, Divya Bhandari, Yasutaka Ojio, Amy Ronaldson, Estefania Guerrero, Tesnime Jebara, Claire Henderson, Mike Slade, Sara Vilar-Lluch
{"title":"Applying Critical Discourse Analysis to Cross-Cultural Mental Health Recovery Research.","authors":"Yasuhiro Kotera, Riddhi Daryanani, Oliver Skipper, Jonathan Simpson, Simran Takhi, Merly McPhilbin, Benjamin-Rose Ingall, Mariam Namasaba, Jessica Jepps, Vanessa Kellermann, Divya Bhandari, Yasutaka Ojio, Amy Ronaldson, Estefania Guerrero, Tesnime Jebara, Claire Henderson, Mike Slade, Sara Vilar-Lluch","doi":"10.2196/64087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how critical discourse analysis (CDA) frameworks can be used in cross-cultural mental health recovery research. CDA is a qualitative approach that critically appraises how language contributes to producing and reinforcing social inequalities. CDA regards linguistic productions as reflecting, consciously or unconsciously, the narrators' understandings of, or attitudes about, phenomena. Mental health recovery research aims to identify and address power differentials, making CDA a potentially relevant approach. However, CDA frameworks have not been widely applied to mental health recovery research. We adapted established CDA frameworks to our cross-cultural mental health recovery study. The adapted methodology comprises (1) selecting discourses that indicate positive changes and (2) considering sociocultural practices informed by relevant cultural characteristics identified in our previous research, without placing value judgments. Our adapted framework can support cross-cultural mental health recovery research that uses CDA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e64087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/64087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how critical discourse analysis (CDA) frameworks can be used in cross-cultural mental health recovery research. CDA is a qualitative approach that critically appraises how language contributes to producing and reinforcing social inequalities. CDA regards linguistic productions as reflecting, consciously or unconsciously, the narrators' understandings of, or attitudes about, phenomena. Mental health recovery research aims to identify and address power differentials, making CDA a potentially relevant approach. However, CDA frameworks have not been widely applied to mental health recovery research. We adapted established CDA frameworks to our cross-cultural mental health recovery study. The adapted methodology comprises (1) selecting discourses that indicate positive changes and (2) considering sociocultural practices informed by relevant cultural characteristics identified in our previous research, without placing value judgments. Our adapted framework can support cross-cultural mental health recovery research that uses CDA.