Central vein stenosis- prevalence, clinical characteristics, outcome and its impact on dialysis access.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
K Sai Sindhu Singh, Yerramachu Dharanidhar Reddy, Manoj Kumar, Lakshmi Aishwarya Pavuluri, Elayaperumal Indhumathi
{"title":"Central vein stenosis- prevalence, clinical characteristics, outcome and its impact on dialysis access.","authors":"K Sai Sindhu Singh, Yerramachu Dharanidhar Reddy, Manoj Kumar, Lakshmi Aishwarya Pavuluri, Elayaperumal Indhumathi","doi":"10.1007/s10047-025-01495-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a complication primarily affecting chronic hemodialysis patients, frequently resulting in vascular access dysfunction and decreased dialysis efficacy. While CVS has a variable mortality rate, its impact on dialysis access is profound, including arm edema, facial swelling, and venous hypertension. We describe the prevalence, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes of CVS for vascular access in hemodialysis patients. We conducted a prospective observational study from July 2023 to June 2024, on patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) at a tertiary care center in South India who had CVS detected by CT Venography. Demographic information, comorbidity, access type, stenosis location, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Of the 152 patients on MHD, 20 (13.1%) had CVS. Of them, 7 patients were on tunneled catheter and 13 were on AVF. Arm edema (47%) was the most common symptom, followed by face swelling (29%) and prolonged bleeding (11%) from arteriovenous fistula post dialysis. The brachiocephalic vein (BCV) was the most common site of stenosis in 65% of patients. Angioplasty was performed in (N = 9) nine patients with a primary success rate of 66% and a six-month patency of 44.4%. In the remaining eleven (N = 11) four patients (20%) transitioned to CAPD, three (15%) had new access of which two had femoral catheter inserted and other one had new AVF creation done and two (10%) continued dialysis via same access. Mortality occurred in two patients (10%) due to pulmonary edema. The Prevalence of CVS in our study population was 13.1%. Six-month primary patency rate among those who underwent intervention was 44.4%. Vascular access had to be terminated in 55%.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-025-01495-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central vein stenosis (CVS) is a complication primarily affecting chronic hemodialysis patients, frequently resulting in vascular access dysfunction and decreased dialysis efficacy. While CVS has a variable mortality rate, its impact on dialysis access is profound, including arm edema, facial swelling, and venous hypertension. We describe the prevalence, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes of CVS for vascular access in hemodialysis patients. We conducted a prospective observational study from July 2023 to June 2024, on patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) at a tertiary care center in South India who had CVS detected by CT Venography. Demographic information, comorbidity, access type, stenosis location, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. Of the 152 patients on MHD, 20 (13.1%) had CVS. Of them, 7 patients were on tunneled catheter and 13 were on AVF. Arm edema (47%) was the most common symptom, followed by face swelling (29%) and prolonged bleeding (11%) from arteriovenous fistula post dialysis. The brachiocephalic vein (BCV) was the most common site of stenosis in 65% of patients. Angioplasty was performed in (N = 9) nine patients with a primary success rate of 66% and a six-month patency of 44.4%. In the remaining eleven (N = 11) four patients (20%) transitioned to CAPD, three (15%) had new access of which two had femoral catheter inserted and other one had new AVF creation done and two (10%) continued dialysis via same access. Mortality occurred in two patients (10%) due to pulmonary edema. The Prevalence of CVS in our study population was 13.1%. Six-month primary patency rate among those who underwent intervention was 44.4%. Vascular access had to be terminated in 55%.

中央静脉狭窄-患病率,临床特征,结果及其对透析通路的影响。
中心静脉狭窄(CVS)是主要影响慢性血液透析患者的并发症,常导致血管通路障碍和透析效果下降。虽然CVS有不同的死亡率,但它对透析通路的影响是深远的,包括手臂水肿、面部肿胀和静脉高压。我们描述了血液透析患者血管通路CVS的患病率、临床表现和治疗结果。我们于2023年7月至2024年6月对在南印度一家三级保健中心接受维持性血液透析(MHD)的患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,这些患者通过CT静脉造影检测到CVS。收集和分析人口统计学信息、合并症、通路类型、狭窄位置、临床表现、治疗和结局数据。在152例MHD患者中,20例(13.1%)有CVS。其中7例采用隧道导管,13例采用AVF。手臂水肿(47%)是最常见的症状,其次是面部肿胀(29%)和透析后动静脉瘘引起的长期出血(11%)。头臂静脉(BCV)是65%患者最常见的狭窄部位。我们对9例患者进行了血管成形术,初步成功率为66%,6个月通畅率为44.4%。在其余11例(N = 11)中,4例(20%)过渡到CAPD, 3例(15%)有新的通路,其中2例插入股导管,1例进行了新的AVF创建,2例(10%)通过相同的通路继续透析。2例(10%)患者死于肺水肿。CVS在我们的研究人群中的患病率为13.1%。干预组6个月一期通畅率为44.4%。55%的患者必须终止血管通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Organs
Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信