A novel, rapid, and effective technique for whole lung lavage in patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and silicosis: retrospective study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Eviatar Naamany, Karam Azem, Shai M Amor, Safo Awad, Lev Freidkin, Dror Rosengarten, Shimon Izhakian, Mordechai R Kramer
{"title":"A novel, rapid, and effective technique for whole lung lavage in patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and silicosis: retrospective study.","authors":"Eviatar Naamany, Karam Azem, Shai M Amor, Safo Awad, Lev Freidkin, Dror Rosengarten, Shimon Izhakian, Mordechai R Kramer","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03540-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) presents a significant challenge due to its progressive and potentially fatal nature. Whole lung lavage (WLL) is a key treatment for primary PAP with respiratory failure. Despite its efficacy, the lack of standardised protocols has led to diverse practice techniques across different institutions. Our study introduces a novel approach, employing a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system for infusing lavage fluid, a method not previously utilised. This paper will share our pioneering experience with this technique at a tertiary referral centre, focusing on its implementation and safety profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 18 who underwent WLL for PAP or silicosis. Pre-lavage preparations included chest X-rays and pulmonary function tests (PFT). Preprocedural empiric antibiotics were administered. During lavage, warm saline was infused using a CPB, with cycles of normal saline infusion and degassing until fluid clarity was reached. Positioning techniques facilitated saline drainage. The procedure concluded with intravenous furosemide administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two WLLs were identified between 2010 and 2024; complete data was available for 33 procedures. Of these, 91% were due to PAP, and 9% to silicosis. Almost half of the patients did not require additional WLL, while 43% needed sequential contralateral WLL. Median operative and mechanical ventilation times were 65 [58.5, 67.5] and 118 [97, 195] minutes, respectively. The median length of hospital stay was two days [2, 3]. Although not statistically significant, O2 saturation and a 6-minute walk distance increase were observed after the WLL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study outlines our novel approach to WLL, which incorporates rapid saline infusion via a CPB system. Our findings indicate reduced procedure time while maintaining safety and efficacy for treating PAP and silicosis. Despite promising results, the retrospective design and small sample size limit generalizability. Further high-quality studies are warranted to validate and refine this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11846273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03540-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) presents a significant challenge due to its progressive and potentially fatal nature. Whole lung lavage (WLL) is a key treatment for primary PAP with respiratory failure. Despite its efficacy, the lack of standardised protocols has led to diverse practice techniques across different institutions. Our study introduces a novel approach, employing a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system for infusing lavage fluid, a method not previously utilised. This paper will share our pioneering experience with this technique at a tertiary referral centre, focusing on its implementation and safety profile.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 18 who underwent WLL for PAP or silicosis. Pre-lavage preparations included chest X-rays and pulmonary function tests (PFT). Preprocedural empiric antibiotics were administered. During lavage, warm saline was infused using a CPB, with cycles of normal saline infusion and degassing until fluid clarity was reached. Positioning techniques facilitated saline drainage. The procedure concluded with intravenous furosemide administration.

Results: Fifty-two WLLs were identified between 2010 and 2024; complete data was available for 33 procedures. Of these, 91% were due to PAP, and 9% to silicosis. Almost half of the patients did not require additional WLL, while 43% needed sequential contralateral WLL. Median operative and mechanical ventilation times were 65 [58.5, 67.5] and 118 [97, 195] minutes, respectively. The median length of hospital stay was two days [2, 3]. Although not statistically significant, O2 saturation and a 6-minute walk distance increase were observed after the WLL.

Conclusion: This study outlines our novel approach to WLL, which incorporates rapid saline infusion via a CPB system. Our findings indicate reduced procedure time while maintaining safety and efficacy for treating PAP and silicosis. Despite promising results, the retrospective design and small sample size limit generalizability. Further high-quality studies are warranted to validate and refine this technique.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信