Neural correlates of communication modes in medical students using fMRI.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROIMAGING
Brain Imaging and Behavior Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1007/s11682-025-00985-z
Raluca Corina Oprea, Frederic Andersson, Valerie Gissot, Thomas Desmidt, Marta Siragusa, Laurent Barantin, Patrice Dubourg, Wissam El-Hage
{"title":"Neural correlates of communication modes in medical students using fMRI.","authors":"Raluca Corina Oprea, Frederic Andersson, Valerie Gissot, Thomas Desmidt, Marta Siragusa, Laurent Barantin, Patrice Dubourg, Wissam El-Hage","doi":"10.1007/s11682-025-00985-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to determine if the six different types of communication (Directive, Imaginative, Reflective, Persuasive, Harmonizing, Promoting), as presented in the Process Communication Model, correlate with a respective neural pathway. Participants were 30 medical students with no past medical history. They underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while watching videos typical of each communication type. By comparing each of the six experimental conditions with all the other ones, common activations were detected in the core memory network. Assertive communication styles (Directive, Imaginative) generated activations in conflict detection and resolution related areas, with a predominance in the frontal lobe. Emotive communication (Harmonizing, Promoting) highlighted activations associated with the interpretation of social and emotional cues, with a temporo-occipital predominance. There were no significant activations for the Reflective and Persuasive channel, the two channels that were most coherent with the subjects' base patterns and communication. This study indicated that out of the six communication types that were analyzed, four have a specific and congruous underlying cerebral process. This shows that neural response patterns vary across different communication styles, reflecting differences in cognitive and emotional processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9192,"journal":{"name":"Brain Imaging and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"446-455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Imaging and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-025-00985-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine if the six different types of communication (Directive, Imaginative, Reflective, Persuasive, Harmonizing, Promoting), as presented in the Process Communication Model, correlate with a respective neural pathway. Participants were 30 medical students with no past medical history. They underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while watching videos typical of each communication type. By comparing each of the six experimental conditions with all the other ones, common activations were detected in the core memory network. Assertive communication styles (Directive, Imaginative) generated activations in conflict detection and resolution related areas, with a predominance in the frontal lobe. Emotive communication (Harmonizing, Promoting) highlighted activations associated with the interpretation of social and emotional cues, with a temporo-occipital predominance. There were no significant activations for the Reflective and Persuasive channel, the two channels that were most coherent with the subjects' base patterns and communication. This study indicated that out of the six communication types that were analyzed, four have a specific and congruous underlying cerebral process. This shows that neural response patterns vary across different communication styles, reflecting differences in cognitive and emotional processing.

利用功能磁共振成像研究医学生交流模式的神经相关性。
本研究旨在确定过程沟通模型中提出的六种不同类型的沟通(指令性、想象性、反思性、劝导性、协调性、促进性)是否与各自的神经通路相关。参与者为30名没有病史的医学生。他们在观看每种通信类型的典型视频时接受了功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)。通过将六种实验条件中的每一种与所有其他条件进行比较,在核心记忆网络中检测到共同的激活。自信的沟通风格(指令性、想象性)产生了冲突检测和解决相关区域的激活,在额叶中占主导地位。情感交流(协调、促进)强调了与社会和情感线索解释相关的激活,并以颞枕部为主。反思和说服通道没有明显的激活,这两个通道与受试者的基本模式和交流最为一致。这项研究表明,在被分析的六种沟通类型中,有四种具有特定的、一致的潜在大脑过程。这表明神经反应模式在不同的沟通方式中有所不同,反映了认知和情绪处理的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Imaging and Behavior
Brain Imaging and Behavior 医学-神经成像
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Brain Imaging and Behavior is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed journal, that publishes clinically relevant research using neuroimaging approaches to enhance our understanding of disorders of higher brain function. The journal is targeted at clinicians and researchers in fields concerned with human brain-behavior relationships, such as neuropsychology, psychiatry, neurology, neurosurgery, rehabilitation, and cognitive neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信