Regional ecological risk assessment and transfer mechanism based on improved gravity and social network analysis model: A case study of Northwest China

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ruiyang Li , Zhaocai Wang , Yanyu Li , Tunhua Wu
{"title":"Regional ecological risk assessment and transfer mechanism based on improved gravity and social network analysis model: A case study of Northwest China","authors":"Ruiyang Li ,&nbsp;Zhaocai Wang ,&nbsp;Yanyu Li ,&nbsp;Tunhua Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the acceleration of industrialization and urbanization, regional ecological risk issues have become increasingly prominent. Scientifically assessing and analyzing ecological risks is crucial for implementing effective ecological protection measures. Currently, most studies primarily focus on the isolated ecological risk conditions of individual regions, while the interactive transfer relationships of ecological risks among these regions have received little attention. This limitation hinders a comprehensive and scientific reflection of the overall trends in regional ecological risks. Therefore, it is necessary to construct relevant models for an in-depth investigation of this issue. This study employs an improved gravity model to simulate the interactive transfer of ecological risks between different regions within the ecosystem framework, considering soil pollution, air pollution, and economic transmission pathways. Additionally, a social network analysis (SNA) model is applied to further dissect the mechanisms of ecological risk transfer among regions. Furthermore, by integrating ecological risk indices based on land use types and landscape patterns, a comprehensive ecological risk assessment method is proposed. Finally, a comprehensive assessment and analysis of ecological risks in five provinces of Northwest China from 2003 to 2022 is conducted. The results indicate that during the period from 2003 to 2022, the comprehensive ecological risk index of the region exhibited a fluctuating trend, remaining within an alert range overall. The spatial relative differences in ecological risk first increased and then decreased, showing a peak pattern. The transfer of pollution among regions through different pathways significantly increased the share of regional comprehensive risks, particularly in Gansu (88.87%), Qinghai (79.35%), and Shaanxi (70.91%). Moreover, the findings also indicate that Gansu is a significant transmitter of regional comprehensive ecological risks, warranting substantial attention. This research provides a scientific basis for risk assessment and governance in ecologically fragile areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 113243"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25001724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the acceleration of industrialization and urbanization, regional ecological risk issues have become increasingly prominent. Scientifically assessing and analyzing ecological risks is crucial for implementing effective ecological protection measures. Currently, most studies primarily focus on the isolated ecological risk conditions of individual regions, while the interactive transfer relationships of ecological risks among these regions have received little attention. This limitation hinders a comprehensive and scientific reflection of the overall trends in regional ecological risks. Therefore, it is necessary to construct relevant models for an in-depth investigation of this issue. This study employs an improved gravity model to simulate the interactive transfer of ecological risks between different regions within the ecosystem framework, considering soil pollution, air pollution, and economic transmission pathways. Additionally, a social network analysis (SNA) model is applied to further dissect the mechanisms of ecological risk transfer among regions. Furthermore, by integrating ecological risk indices based on land use types and landscape patterns, a comprehensive ecological risk assessment method is proposed. Finally, a comprehensive assessment and analysis of ecological risks in five provinces of Northwest China from 2003 to 2022 is conducted. The results indicate that during the period from 2003 to 2022, the comprehensive ecological risk index of the region exhibited a fluctuating trend, remaining within an alert range overall. The spatial relative differences in ecological risk first increased and then decreased, showing a peak pattern. The transfer of pollution among regions through different pathways significantly increased the share of regional comprehensive risks, particularly in Gansu (88.87%), Qinghai (79.35%), and Shaanxi (70.91%). Moreover, the findings also indicate that Gansu is a significant transmitter of regional comprehensive ecological risks, warranting substantial attention. This research provides a scientific basis for risk assessment and governance in ecologically fragile areas.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信