{"title":"Quantifying the impact of different precipitation data sources on hydrological modeling processes in arid basin using transfer entropy","authors":"Qingling Bao , Jianli Ding , Jinjie Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multi-source precipitation products (MSPs) are critical for hydrologic modeling, but their spatial and temporal heterogeneity and uncertainty present challenges to simulation accuracy that need to be addressed urgently. This study assessed the impact of different precipitation data sources on hydrologic modeling in an arid basin. There were seven precipitation products and meteorological station interpolated data that were used to drive the hydrological model, and we evaluated their performance by fusing the six precipitation products through the dynamic bayesian averaging algorithm. Ultimately, the runoff simulation uncertainty was quantified based on the DREAM algorithm, and the information transfer entropy was used to quantify the differences in hydrologic simulation processes driven by different precipitation data. The results showed that CMFD and ERA5 weights were higher, and the DBMA fused precipitation annual mean value was about 309.83 mm with good simulation accuracy (RMSE of 1.46 and R<sup>2</sup> of 0.75). The simulation was satisfactory (NSE >0.80) after parameter calibration and data assimilation for all driving data, with CHIRPS and TRMM performed better in the common mode, and HRLT and CMFD performed excellently in the glacier mode. The DREAM algorithm indicated less uncertainty for DBMA, CHIRPS and HRLT data. The entropy of information transfer revealed that precipitation occupied a significant position in information transfer, especially affecting evapotranspiration and surface soil moisture. CMFD and TPS CMADS were highest in snow water equivalent information entropy, and CHIRPS and TPS CMADS were highest in evapotranspiration information entropy. CDR, CHIRPS, ERA5-Land and IDW STATION had the highest snow water equivalent information entropy, DBMA and CMORPH had the highest runoff information entropy, CHIRPS and TRMM had the highest soil moisture information entropy, whereas ERA5, HRLT, and TPS CMADS had the highest evapotranspiration information entropy in glacial mode. This study reveals significant differences between different precipitation data sources in hydrological modeling of arid basin, which is an important reference for future water resources management and climate change adaptation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"187 ","pages":"Article 106376"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136481522500060X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multi-source precipitation products (MSPs) are critical for hydrologic modeling, but their spatial and temporal heterogeneity and uncertainty present challenges to simulation accuracy that need to be addressed urgently. This study assessed the impact of different precipitation data sources on hydrologic modeling in an arid basin. There were seven precipitation products and meteorological station interpolated data that were used to drive the hydrological model, and we evaluated their performance by fusing the six precipitation products through the dynamic bayesian averaging algorithm. Ultimately, the runoff simulation uncertainty was quantified based on the DREAM algorithm, and the information transfer entropy was used to quantify the differences in hydrologic simulation processes driven by different precipitation data. The results showed that CMFD and ERA5 weights were higher, and the DBMA fused precipitation annual mean value was about 309.83 mm with good simulation accuracy (RMSE of 1.46 and R2 of 0.75). The simulation was satisfactory (NSE >0.80) after parameter calibration and data assimilation for all driving data, with CHIRPS and TRMM performed better in the common mode, and HRLT and CMFD performed excellently in the glacier mode. The DREAM algorithm indicated less uncertainty for DBMA, CHIRPS and HRLT data. The entropy of information transfer revealed that precipitation occupied a significant position in information transfer, especially affecting evapotranspiration and surface soil moisture. CMFD and TPS CMADS were highest in snow water equivalent information entropy, and CHIRPS and TPS CMADS were highest in evapotranspiration information entropy. CDR, CHIRPS, ERA5-Land and IDW STATION had the highest snow water equivalent information entropy, DBMA and CMORPH had the highest runoff information entropy, CHIRPS and TRMM had the highest soil moisture information entropy, whereas ERA5, HRLT, and TPS CMADS had the highest evapotranspiration information entropy in glacial mode. This study reveals significant differences between different precipitation data sources in hydrological modeling of arid basin, which is an important reference for future water resources management and climate change adaptation strategies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.