{"title":"From words to multimodalities: Compliment perceptions across lingua cultures","authors":"Fang Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While compliments have been widely studied through various methods, recipient perceptions in multimodal contexts remain insufficiently explored. Multimodal cues, such as intonation, gestures, and facial expressions, may play a crucial role in shaping compliment perception, yet these factors lack systematic analysis. To address this gap, this study examines how compliments are perceived across different modalities using the Modal Incremental Perception Method (MIP). Specifically, it investigates how 362 native speakers of English, Swiss German, and Chinese perceive the same compliments in four modes: text-only, text with emojis, audio, and multimodal video. Through online experiments and retrospective interviews, this study explores multiple dimensions of compliment perception, including sincerity, politeness, appropriateness, likeability, and pleasantness, along with participants' reasoning for their evaluations. The quantitative results show that lingua culture significantly influences perceptions of the four forms of compliments to varying degrees, with the inclusion of multimodal information affecting compliment perceptions across lingua culture groups. Additionally, the qualitative analysis shows that participants’ reasons for compliment perceptions are influenced by both lingua culture and individual differences. Overall, this study shifts the analytical focus from compliment production to perception and provides a multidimensional perspective on compliments, therefore advancing speech act research from the perspective of compliments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"239 ","pages":"Pages 94-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While compliments have been widely studied through various methods, recipient perceptions in multimodal contexts remain insufficiently explored. Multimodal cues, such as intonation, gestures, and facial expressions, may play a crucial role in shaping compliment perception, yet these factors lack systematic analysis. To address this gap, this study examines how compliments are perceived across different modalities using the Modal Incremental Perception Method (MIP). Specifically, it investigates how 362 native speakers of English, Swiss German, and Chinese perceive the same compliments in four modes: text-only, text with emojis, audio, and multimodal video. Through online experiments and retrospective interviews, this study explores multiple dimensions of compliment perception, including sincerity, politeness, appropriateness, likeability, and pleasantness, along with participants' reasoning for their evaluations. The quantitative results show that lingua culture significantly influences perceptions of the four forms of compliments to varying degrees, with the inclusion of multimodal information affecting compliment perceptions across lingua culture groups. Additionally, the qualitative analysis shows that participants’ reasons for compliment perceptions are influenced by both lingua culture and individual differences. Overall, this study shifts the analytical focus from compliment production to perception and provides a multidimensional perspective on compliments, therefore advancing speech act research from the perspective of compliments.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.