Good modeling practice for calibration applied to ion exchange breakthrough prediction

IF 8.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Daniel Illana González, Mariane Yvonne Schneider, Juan Pablo Gallo, Ingmar Nopens, Elena Torfs
{"title":"Good modeling practice for calibration applied to ion exchange breakthrough prediction","authors":"Daniel Illana González, Mariane Yvonne Schneider, Juan Pablo Gallo, Ingmar Nopens, Elena Torfs","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ion exchange (IX) is a key technology in resource recovery processes for demineralization and fit-for-purpose water production due to its inherent ion-selective recovery properties. A major bottleneck in the optimization of the IX process is the accurate prediction of ion breakthrough times, which has the potential to save on regeneration chemicals by maximizing resin utilization. However, the models used to predict ion breakthrough times are often unreliable due to poor calibration methods and significant uncertainty in parameter estimates. Consequently, we conducted local and global sensitivity analyses to identify the design and operational parameters that contribute most to the prediction of breakthrough curves. The global sensitivity analysis enabled the selection of a limited subset of parameters for calibration, demonstrating that only two parameters, namely the maximum adsorption capacity isotherm parameter and the resin bead particle size, require thorough calibration, resulting in a 76 % improvement in the breakthrough prediction. We also showed that the calibration of additional, less sensitive or correlated parameters results in an insignificant improvement of the predictive power, with a 16 % to 60 % increased uncertainty in the breakthrough time prediction. The model was validated using three independent data sets, which showed a fairly accurate breakthrough time prediction, with a relative error ranging from 1 % to 11 %. Herein, we propose a robust calibration procedure, based on good modeling practice, that encompasses both sensitivity and uncertainty analyses and therefore provides a basis for process optimization. The framework is presented in a manner that allows for its application to analogous process settings.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.132192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ion exchange (IX) is a key technology in resource recovery processes for demineralization and fit-for-purpose water production due to its inherent ion-selective recovery properties. A major bottleneck in the optimization of the IX process is the accurate prediction of ion breakthrough times, which has the potential to save on regeneration chemicals by maximizing resin utilization. However, the models used to predict ion breakthrough times are often unreliable due to poor calibration methods and significant uncertainty in parameter estimates. Consequently, we conducted local and global sensitivity analyses to identify the design and operational parameters that contribute most to the prediction of breakthrough curves. The global sensitivity analysis enabled the selection of a limited subset of parameters for calibration, demonstrating that only two parameters, namely the maximum adsorption capacity isotherm parameter and the resin bead particle size, require thorough calibration, resulting in a 76 % improvement in the breakthrough prediction. We also showed that the calibration of additional, less sensitive or correlated parameters results in an insignificant improvement of the predictive power, with a 16 % to 60 % increased uncertainty in the breakthrough time prediction. The model was validated using three independent data sets, which showed a fairly accurate breakthrough time prediction, with a relative error ranging from 1 % to 11 %. Herein, we propose a robust calibration procedure, based on good modeling practice, that encompasses both sensitivity and uncertainty analyses and therefore provides a basis for process optimization. The framework is presented in a manner that allows for its application to analogous process settings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Separation and Purification Technology
Separation and Purification Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2347
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信