Esophageal Injury After Anterior Cervical Spine Fixation: What Can Thoracic Surgeons Offer?

Humood A Alsadery, Yesser Aljehani, Farouk Alreshaid, Yasser Elghoneimy, Omar A Bamalan, Abdulrahman Alblowi, Jumana Alhelal, Ayman Elbaz, Moustafa Aboollo
{"title":"Esophageal Injury After Anterior Cervical Spine Fixation: What Can Thoracic Surgeons Offer?","authors":"Humood A Alsadery, Yesser Aljehani, Farouk Alreshaid, Yasser Elghoneimy, Omar A Bamalan, Abdulrahman Alblowi, Jumana Alhelal, Ayman Elbaz, Moustafa Aboollo","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2024.78.290-295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anterior approach for cervical spine surgery was introduced in the late 1950's and was then extensively used with a known considered risk for an esophageal injury.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Therefore, we designed this study to look into our institution's experience in the treatment of esophageal injury post cervical spine fixation looking at possible causes, presentation and risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of esophageal perforation cases secondary to cervical spine fixation, encountered in King Fahad hospital of the University (Eastern province, Dammam, Saudi Arabia) in between (2008-2019) were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients included were 11, in which the most common presenting symptoms were dysphagia, neck pain, persistent discharge from the cervical wound with or without food particles and odynophagia, while the mean period for presentation was 358.9 days (ranging from 4 to 2555 days). The pharyngo-esophageal perforation repair was done in 9 patients, while 2 patients were treated conservatively. In addition, supportive measures (i.e., frequent wound care, broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, non per oral and adequate feeding via alternative routes) were done for all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esophageal injury, although uncommon in anterior spinal approach, still considered a life-threatening complication and need a low threshold of suspicion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94135,"journal":{"name":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","volume":"78 4","pages":"290-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11838835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2024.78.290-295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The anterior approach for cervical spine surgery was introduced in the late 1950's and was then extensively used with a known considered risk for an esophageal injury.

Objective: Therefore, we designed this study to look into our institution's experience in the treatment of esophageal injury post cervical spine fixation looking at possible causes, presentation and risk factors.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of esophageal perforation cases secondary to cervical spine fixation, encountered in King Fahad hospital of the University (Eastern province, Dammam, Saudi Arabia) in between (2008-2019) were studied.

Results: The patients included were 11, in which the most common presenting symptoms were dysphagia, neck pain, persistent discharge from the cervical wound with or without food particles and odynophagia, while the mean period for presentation was 358.9 days (ranging from 4 to 2555 days). The pharyngo-esophageal perforation repair was done in 9 patients, while 2 patients were treated conservatively. In addition, supportive measures (i.e., frequent wound care, broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, non per oral and adequate feeding via alternative routes) were done for all patients.

Conclusion: Esophageal injury, although uncommon in anterior spinal approach, still considered a life-threatening complication and need a low threshold of suspicion.

颈椎前路固定后食管损伤:胸外科医生能提供什么?
背景:颈椎手术的前路入路是在20世纪50年代末引入的,当时被广泛应用于已知的食管损伤风险。目的:因此,我们设计了这项研究,探讨我院治疗颈椎固定后食管损伤的经验,探讨可能的原因、表现和危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2008-2019年在沙特阿拉伯达曼东部省法赫德国王大学医院收治的颈椎固定后继发食管穿孔病例。结果:本组患者11例,最常见的临床表现为吞咽困难、颈部疼痛、颈部伤口持续性分泌物伴或不伴食物颗粒、吞咽困难,平均就诊时间358.9 d (4 ~ 2555 d)。9例患者行咽食管穿孔修补术,2例患者行保守治疗。此外,对所有患者采取了支持性措施(即,频繁的伤口护理,广谱静脉注射抗生素,非口服和通过其他途径适当喂养)。结论:食管损伤虽然在脊柱前路手术中并不常见,但仍被认为是危及生命的并发症,需要较低的怀疑阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信