DSC MR Perfusion at 7T MRI: An Initial Single-Center Study for Validity and Practicability.

Clare E Buntrock, Ceren Dinçer, Onur Tuncer, Matthew White, Alexis Swensen, Mark Folkertsma, Can Özütemiz
{"title":"DSC MR Perfusion at 7T MRI: An Initial Single-Center Study for Validity and Practicability.","authors":"Clare E Buntrock, Ceren Dinçer, Onur Tuncer, Matthew White, Alexis Swensen, Mark Folkertsma, Can Özütemiz","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>DSC perfusion is an advanced imaging technique routinely used at 1.5T and 3T MRI. However, its utility is not well known in 7T MRI systems. We aim to evaluate if DSC perfusion is a valid and practicable tool at 7T MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A successful DSC perfusion was performed in 9 patients with an FDA-approved 7T MRI system (Siemens Terra with 1tx/32rx Nova head coil) in 2023. Half-dose contrast was administered by hand, followed by saline flush. Acquisition was initiated 45 seconds before contrast injection. Voxel size was 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.6 mm<sup>3</sup>. Perfusion maps were generated by using either SyngoVia or DynaSuite software. Parameters including relative CBV (rCBV), relative CBF (rCBF), relative MTT (rMTT), and relative TTP (rTTP) were measured in 5 anatomic locations bilaterally (precentral gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, corona radiata, thalamus, occipital cortex) and enhancing lesions if present. Normalized ratios of rCBV (nrCBV), rCBF (nrCBF), rMTT (nrMTT), and rTTP (nrTTP) were calculated and compared on boxplots. Two neuroradiologists reviewed each scan visually by using a 5-point Likert scale regarding imaging quality and artifacts. Qualitative and quantitative assessments were made on DSC perfusion in cases with enhanced target lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uploading the source images to imaging software took approximately 30 minutes to a few hours. In a few circumstances, large data caused software crashes. Map generation took approximately 10-15 minutes. Susceptibility artifacts varied from mild to moderate in cerebellum, temporal lobes, brainstem, and basal ganglia and none to minimal in the frontal, occipital, and parietal gyri. Map quality was excellent to reasonably good for all cases. The nrCBV, nrCBF, nrMTT, and nrTTP resulted in similar measurements for each anatomic area. Six target lesions were assessed in 2 different patients with well to excellent visualization on fused maps. Three lesions were characterized as tumor progression (1 biopsy-confirmed, 2 unconfirmed), 1 lesion as indeterminant (regressed in follow-up), and 2 lesions as radiation necrosis (1 stable, 1 regressed on follow-up).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite limitations with postprocessing issues, it is possible to reliably measure nrCBV, nrCBF, nrMTT, and nrTTP values with DSC perfusion by using a clinical 7T MRI system, and qualitatively, excellent or reasonably good fusion maps can be generated with high resolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"627-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: DSC perfusion is an advanced imaging technique routinely used at 1.5T and 3T MRI. However, its utility is not well known in 7T MRI systems. We aim to evaluate if DSC perfusion is a valid and practicable tool at 7T MRI.

Materials and methods: A successful DSC perfusion was performed in 9 patients with an FDA-approved 7T MRI system (Siemens Terra with 1tx/32rx Nova head coil) in 2023. Half-dose contrast was administered by hand, followed by saline flush. Acquisition was initiated 45 seconds before contrast injection. Voxel size was 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.6 mm3. Perfusion maps were generated by using either SyngoVia or DynaSuite software. Parameters including relative CBV (rCBV), relative CBF (rCBF), relative MTT (rMTT), and relative TTP (rTTP) were measured in 5 anatomic locations bilaterally (precentral gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, corona radiata, thalamus, occipital cortex) and enhancing lesions if present. Normalized ratios of rCBV (nrCBV), rCBF (nrCBF), rMTT (nrMTT), and rTTP (nrTTP) were calculated and compared on boxplots. Two neuroradiologists reviewed each scan visually by using a 5-point Likert scale regarding imaging quality and artifacts. Qualitative and quantitative assessments were made on DSC perfusion in cases with enhanced target lesions.

Results: Uploading the source images to imaging software took approximately 30 minutes to a few hours. In a few circumstances, large data caused software crashes. Map generation took approximately 10-15 minutes. Susceptibility artifacts varied from mild to moderate in cerebellum, temporal lobes, brainstem, and basal ganglia and none to minimal in the frontal, occipital, and parietal gyri. Map quality was excellent to reasonably good for all cases. The nrCBV, nrCBF, nrMTT, and nrTTP resulted in similar measurements for each anatomic area. Six target lesions were assessed in 2 different patients with well to excellent visualization on fused maps. Three lesions were characterized as tumor progression (1 biopsy-confirmed, 2 unconfirmed), 1 lesion as indeterminant (regressed in follow-up), and 2 lesions as radiation necrosis (1 stable, 1 regressed on follow-up).

Conclusions: Despite limitations with postprocessing issues, it is possible to reliably measure nrCBV, nrCBF, nrMTT, and nrTTP values with DSC perfusion by using a clinical 7T MRI system, and qualitatively, excellent or reasonably good fusion maps can be generated with high resolution.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信