A scoping review of therapeutic mentoring for youth mental health.

Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frcha.2025.1509971
Alexandra Werntz, Jean E Rhodes, Hannah Brockstein, Lindsay Fallon, Amy Cook
{"title":"A scoping review of therapeutic mentoring for youth mental health.","authors":"Alexandra Werntz, Jean E Rhodes, Hannah Brockstein, Lindsay Fallon, Amy Cook","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2025.1509971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic mentoring, which leverages paraprofessional care, is a potential way to scale access to care to address the youth mental health crisis. This scoping review synthesizes the current state of research on self-designated therapeutic mentoring programs for youth mental health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across four databases using the term \"therapeutic mento*\" and related keywords, taking a label-first approach to describe the available literature. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles about research on therapeutic mentoring in the US, written in English. Data were extracted on study characteristics, intervention details, mentor background, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen empirical articles were identified, published between 2003 and 2024. Most studies focused on at-risk youth from diverse backgrounds. Therapeutic mentoring programming varied, although most (<i>N</i> = 13) studies examined the Campus Connections program. Mentors were typically trained paraprofessionals or undergraduate students supervised by clinical professionals. Only two randomized controlled trials were found, both of the Campus Connections program.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The review revealed a lack of rigorous experimental studies on therapeutic mentoring efficacy, as defined by studies that use the term therapeutic mentoring. While some studies showed promising effects, more research is needed to establish the definition of therapeutic mentoring and whether it is an acceptable and effective intervention for youth mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A clear definition of therapeutic mentoring is needed to advance the field and facilitate systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in supporting youth mental health. Future research should prioritize developing program models that align with diverse youth's cultural values, conducting randomized controlled trials, examining program components, and developing standardized measures for assessing therapeutic mentoring outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"4 ","pages":"1509971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2025.1509971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Therapeutic mentoring, which leverages paraprofessional care, is a potential way to scale access to care to address the youth mental health crisis. This scoping review synthesizes the current state of research on self-designated therapeutic mentoring programs for youth mental health.

Method: A systematic search was conducted across four databases using the term "therapeutic mento*" and related keywords, taking a label-first approach to describe the available literature. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles about research on therapeutic mentoring in the US, written in English. Data were extracted on study characteristics, intervention details, mentor background, and outcomes.

Results: Eighteen empirical articles were identified, published between 2003 and 2024. Most studies focused on at-risk youth from diverse backgrounds. Therapeutic mentoring programming varied, although most (N = 13) studies examined the Campus Connections program. Mentors were typically trained paraprofessionals or undergraduate students supervised by clinical professionals. Only two randomized controlled trials were found, both of the Campus Connections program.

Discussion: The review revealed a lack of rigorous experimental studies on therapeutic mentoring efficacy, as defined by studies that use the term therapeutic mentoring. While some studies showed promising effects, more research is needed to establish the definition of therapeutic mentoring and whether it is an acceptable and effective intervention for youth mental health.

Conclusion: A clear definition of therapeutic mentoring is needed to advance the field and facilitate systematic evaluation of its effectiveness in supporting youth mental health. Future research should prioritize developing program models that align with diverse youth's cultural values, conducting randomized controlled trials, examining program components, and developing standardized measures for assessing therapeutic mentoring outcomes.

Abstract Image

青少年心理健康治疗性辅导的范围审查。
导言:利用辅助专业护理的治疗性指导是扩大获得护理以解决青年心理健康危机的潜在途径。本综述综合了青少年心理健康自我指定治疗性辅导项目的研究现状。方法:系统检索四个数据库,使用术语“治疗mento*”和相关关键词,采用标签优先的方法来描述可用的文献。入选标准是关于美国治疗指导研究的同行评议文章,用英文撰写。提取研究特征、干预细节、导师背景和结果的数据。结果:在2003年至2024年间,共发现了18篇实证文章。大多数研究关注的是来自不同背景的高危青少年。尽管大多数(N = 13)研究考察了校园联系项目,但治疗性辅导项目各不相同。导师通常是训练有素的辅助专业人员或由临床专业人员监督的本科生。只发现了两个随机对照试验,都是校园联系项目。讨论:回顾显示缺乏严格的实验研究治疗指导的功效,用研究定义的术语治疗指导。虽然一些研究显示出有希望的效果,但需要更多的研究来确定治疗性指导的定义,以及它是否是一种可接受的、有效的青少年心理健康干预措施。结论:需要明确治疗性辅导的定义,以促进该领域的发展,并便于系统评估其在支持青少年心理健康方面的有效性。未来的研究应优先发展与不同青年文化价值观相一致的项目模式,进行随机对照试验,检查项目组成部分,并制定评估治疗指导结果的标准化措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信