Adolescent and parental proxy online record access: analysis of the empirical evidence based on four bioethical principles.

IF 3 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Josefin Hagström, Maria Hägglund, Charlotte Blease
{"title":"Adolescent and parental proxy online record access: analysis of the empirical evidence based on four bioethical principles.","authors":"Josefin Hagström, Maria Hägglund, Charlotte Blease","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01182-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During recent decades, providing patients with access to their electronic health records (EHRs) has advanced in healthcare. In the European Union (EU), the General Data Protection Regulation provides individuals with the right to check their data in registries such as EHRs. A proposal for a European Health Data Space has been launched, which will further strengthen patients' right to have online access to their EHRs throughout Europe. Against these policy changes, scant attention has been paid to the ethical question about whether adolescents and parents should access the adolescent's EHR, and if so, under what conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this paper, we apply biomedical ethical principles to explore key questions about adolescents' and parents' access to adolescents' EHRs, with the aim of informing future discussions about the development of ethical and policy practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Drawing on current empirical research, we find preliminary evidence that in some contexts, patient online record access (ORA) could help to facilitate autonomy for adolescents and parents as well as offering support in managing appointments and medications. Notably, however, we find contrasting perspectives between adolescents' and parents' experienced benefits and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceived potential harm, with the latter worried about decreased documentation quality after access. Concerns about capacity to understand their health information, and increased anxiety among adolescents obstruct the support of adolescent autonomy among parents and HCPs. Still, research is limited, particularly with respect to adolescents' experiences of reading their EHRs, and differences across settings have not been closely examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To advance more comprehensive understanding of the effects of ORA, and to inspire greater attention to, and development of, evidence-informed ethical guidance in this domain of clinical practice, we outline a range of empirical questions regarding adolescents' and parents' experiences that now warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01182-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During recent decades, providing patients with access to their electronic health records (EHRs) has advanced in healthcare. In the European Union (EU), the General Data Protection Regulation provides individuals with the right to check their data in registries such as EHRs. A proposal for a European Health Data Space has been launched, which will further strengthen patients' right to have online access to their EHRs throughout Europe. Against these policy changes, scant attention has been paid to the ethical question about whether adolescents and parents should access the adolescent's EHR, and if so, under what conditions.

Methods: In this paper, we apply biomedical ethical principles to explore key questions about adolescents' and parents' access to adolescents' EHRs, with the aim of informing future discussions about the development of ethical and policy practice guidelines.

Results: Drawing on current empirical research, we find preliminary evidence that in some contexts, patient online record access (ORA) could help to facilitate autonomy for adolescents and parents as well as offering support in managing appointments and medications. Notably, however, we find contrasting perspectives between adolescents' and parents' experienced benefits and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceived potential harm, with the latter worried about decreased documentation quality after access. Concerns about capacity to understand their health information, and increased anxiety among adolescents obstruct the support of adolescent autonomy among parents and HCPs. Still, research is limited, particularly with respect to adolescents' experiences of reading their EHRs, and differences across settings have not been closely examined.

Conclusions: To advance more comprehensive understanding of the effects of ORA, and to inspire greater attention to, and development of, evidence-informed ethical guidance in this domain of clinical practice, we outline a range of empirical questions regarding adolescents' and parents' experiences that now warrant further study.

青少年和父母代理在线记录访问:基于四项生物伦理原则的实证分析。
背景:近几十年来,向患者提供他们的电子健康记录(EHRs)在医疗保健方面取得了进展。在欧盟(EU),《通用数据保护条例》规定个人有权在电子病历等登记处检查他们的数据。已经提出了一项关于欧洲卫生数据空间的建议,这将进一步加强整个欧洲患者在线访问其电子病历的权利。在这些政策变化的背景下,关于青少年和父母是否应该访问青少年的电子病历,以及如果可以,在什么条件下访问的伦理问题很少得到关注。方法:本文运用生物医学伦理原则,探讨青少年和家长获取青少年电子病历的关键问题,为未来伦理和政策实践指南的制定提供参考。结果:根据目前的实证研究,我们发现初步证据表明,在某些情况下,患者在线记录访问(ORA)可以帮助促进青少年和家长的自主权,并在预约和药物管理方面提供支持。然而,值得注意的是,我们发现青少年和父母体验到的好处与卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)感知到的潜在危害之间的对比观点,后者担心访问后文件质量下降。对理解其健康信息的能力的担忧,以及青少年日益增加的焦虑,阻碍了父母和卫生保健提供者对青少年自主的支持。然而,研究是有限的,特别是关于青少年阅读电子病历的经历,不同环境的差异还没有被仔细研究。结论:为了更全面地了解ORA的效果,并在这一临床实践领域激发对循证伦理指导的更多关注和发展,我们概述了一系列关于青少年和父母经历的实证问题,这些问题现在值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信