Efficacy of Steroid Facet Joint Injections for Axial Spinal Pain and Post Radiofrequency Ablation Neuritis: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alan D Kaye, Amy E Brouillette, Cameron A Howe, Sheeza Wajid, Joseph R Archer, Rachael Bartolina, Jon D Hirsch, Jeffrey T Howard, Daniel Bass, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Laxmaiah Manchikanti
{"title":"Efficacy of Steroid Facet Joint Injections for Axial Spinal Pain and Post Radiofrequency Ablation Neuritis: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Amy E Brouillette, Cameron A Howe, Sheeza Wajid, Joseph R Archer, Rachael Bartolina, Jon D Hirsch, Jeffrey T Howard, Daniel Bass, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Sahar Shekoohi, Laxmaiah Manchikanti","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01369-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chronic axial spinal pain is a leading cause of disability and healthcare spending in the United States. A common source of axial spinal pain is the facet joint. Current treatments for facet joint-mediated pain include conservative treatments and interventions such as intra-articular facet joint injections (FJI), medial branch blocks (MBB), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). While facet joint interventions are one of the most common spinal procedures, current scientific literature demonstrates conflicting results regarding the use of corticosteroids in these interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of local corticosteroid usage in facet joint interventions for treating chronic axial spinal pain. Separate literature searches were performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Library to evaluate the use of local corticosteroids in intra-articular FJI, MBB, and for the prevention of post-neurotomy neuritis (PNN). Inclusion criteria included a randomized clinical trial (RCT) or control trial while unique inclusion criteria was used for the differing uses of local corticosteroids. The exclusion criteria for studies included (i) studies written in a non-English language; (ii) articles without full-text access or abstract-only papers; (iii) and studies focused on non-human subjects. Final literature searches were conducted in August 2024. Two studies with 131 patients, four studies with 440 patients, and two studies with 203 patients were selected for the assessment of local corticosteroid use on intra-articular FJI, MBB, and PNN, respectively. A quality assessment tool recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess bias risk in included studies. Results were synthesized through a meta-analysis to evaluate intra-articular FJI while a literature analysis was completed to investigate MBB and PNN. This study found that the use of corticosteroid intra-articular FJI and MBB provides significant improvement in pain relief and functionality from baseline for the treatment of lower back pain and chronic axial spinal pain, respectively. However, the use of corticosteroids post-RFA has not been proven to reduce the occurrence of PNN. Limitations to the studies used included blinding bias, absence of placebo groups, subjective inclusion criteria, limited generalizability and small sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01369-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Chronic axial spinal pain is a leading cause of disability and healthcare spending in the United States. A common source of axial spinal pain is the facet joint. Current treatments for facet joint-mediated pain include conservative treatments and interventions such as intra-articular facet joint injections (FJI), medial branch blocks (MBB), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). While facet joint interventions are one of the most common spinal procedures, current scientific literature demonstrates conflicting results regarding the use of corticosteroids in these interventions.

Recent findings: A systematic review was conducted to determine the efficacy of local corticosteroid usage in facet joint interventions for treating chronic axial spinal pain. Separate literature searches were performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Library to evaluate the use of local corticosteroids in intra-articular FJI, MBB, and for the prevention of post-neurotomy neuritis (PNN). Inclusion criteria included a randomized clinical trial (RCT) or control trial while unique inclusion criteria was used for the differing uses of local corticosteroids. The exclusion criteria for studies included (i) studies written in a non-English language; (ii) articles without full-text access or abstract-only papers; (iii) and studies focused on non-human subjects. Final literature searches were conducted in August 2024. Two studies with 131 patients, four studies with 440 patients, and two studies with 203 patients were selected for the assessment of local corticosteroid use on intra-articular FJI, MBB, and PNN, respectively. A quality assessment tool recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess bias risk in included studies. Results were synthesized through a meta-analysis to evaluate intra-articular FJI while a literature analysis was completed to investigate MBB and PNN. This study found that the use of corticosteroid intra-articular FJI and MBB provides significant improvement in pain relief and functionality from baseline for the treatment of lower back pain and chronic axial spinal pain, respectively. However, the use of corticosteroids post-RFA has not been proven to reduce the occurrence of PNN. Limitations to the studies used included blinding bias, absence of placebo groups, subjective inclusion criteria, limited generalizability and small sample sizes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信